Re: [mrtg] Bandwidth of entire Switch

This is a discussion on Re: [mrtg] Bandwidth of entire Switch within the MRTG forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Good to know, I will look into the router2 I have not checked that out yet. The reasoning for the ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > MRTG

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 6 Days Ago
Joel A Savage
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [mrtg] Bandwidth of entire Switch

Good to know,

I will look into the router2 I have not checked that out yet.

The reasoning for the overview was to have a list of graphs of all the
switches and if there were a bottle neck or high bandwidth in one place
we would be able to see it without having to drill down into each one to
look at the ports.

I am not familiar with the router2 but I will become acquainted with it
and see what it offers.

I think I might also look into what was suggested ealier about simply
monitoring the uplink ports for an over all for each switch.

Thank you everyone for your helpful replies.

jas




-----Original Message-----
From: mrtg-bounces@lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces@lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel J McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 8:20 AM
To: mrtg@lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] Bandwidth of entire Switch

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:59 -0400, scoob8000 wrote:
> Why couldn't he just do something like:
>
> Target[totalswitch]: 1:public@192.168.1.10 + 2:public@192.168.1.10 +
> 3:public@192.168.1.10 + 4:public@192.168.1.10:
>
> For all the ports he wants to graph? (And set maxbytes accordingly)
>


Because the cumulative rollover effect gives vastly unpredictable
results. MRTG can cope with a single counter rollover. Trying to sum
52 gigabit interfaces and make sense of the rollovers is sheer madness.
Even two interfaces is problematic, and will result in un-predictable
spikes and valleys.

> Or you could use a shell script (linux) to minimize your queries.
> Query all the ports for your individual charts, then add them together
> for a aggregate chart..


Why not just use routers2? Or ignore the whole request because it
sounds like a PHB wants it (who cares how busy the switch fabric is if
it is not a constrained resource? It's not like knowing the aggregate
traffic is going to enable you to plan/justify when a switch upgrade is
necessary)


--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com

_______________________________________________
mrtg mailing list
mrtg@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg

_______________________________________________
mrtg mailing list
mrtg@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0