M I.5'Per secution ' purpose in p ublicizing i t; censorsh ip in uk. * newsgrou ps

This is a discussion on M I.5'Per secution ' purpose in p ublicizing i t; censorsh ip in uk. * newsgrou ps within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= purpose in publicizing it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups. -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The postings. to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction from ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > mailing.postfix.users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2008
vefivmv@hotmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default M I.5'Per secution ' purpose in p ublicizing i t; censorsh ip in uk. * newsgrou ps

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= purpose in publicizing it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups. -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The postings. to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very defensive reaction from
Usenet readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried. strenuously to
suppress what was being. said, both by breaking the rules of netiquette in
their responses on the forum, and directly by action. to revoke the account
from which the. postings were issued.

Yet the postings were within. the normal boundaries of behaviour for
uk.misc, and. other less partisan spectators did not see justice in the
censorship. which was effected, as the following excerpt shows;

:Karen Lofstrom. (lofstrom@lava.net) wrote
:>It does seem. that the frequency and the size of his posts are
:>approaching net abuse. However,. IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If
:>his. postmaster were to act in this instance, it would raise troubling
:>censorship. issues.

The inescapable conclusion of. the censorship effected on the uk.*
newsgroups is that the British are intent on. their wrongdoing remaining
concealed, and therefore. seek to subvert and suppress freedom of speech,
not only. in their own country where the media shows xenophobic bias and
bile against all. perceived enemies within and without, but also in other
countries which have their own statutes to. guarantee the basic human right
of. free speech.

It is absolutely necessary to bring their hate campaign out. into the open
where it can be placed under scrutiny and the harassers seen for. what they
are. That is. the only way of making it impossible for the security services
to carry it out. There is a wider dimension, though. Xenophobia. as
demonstrated by British people and institutions over the last few. years
belongs to the same stable as racial. hatred. In one case, two youths on a
Tube train made that racism explicit by referring. to their victim as a
"soft toy, not. up to British Standards". Doubtless others victimize partly
on the. basis of race (isn’t it odd that they chose to torment someone who
is not ethnically English?) while. expressing their abuse in terms of
another genetic attribute, namely mental illness. All xenophobia. on a
genetic basis. is wrong, but while racial insults are illegal, abusing the
mentally ill is neither. against the law nor subject to similar condemnation
when it is. exposed.

6415

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0