This is a discussion on Address verification in progress within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; I could not find in postconf if there is a way to increase a timeout for Address verification that makes &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I could not find in postconf if there is a way to increase a timeout
for Address verification that makes "Sender address rejected: unverified address: Address verification in progress;" instantly on a slow network. I know, the mail will be accepted at the other MTA's try, but it's bad solution for me :-( . So, is there a way just to increase timeout? Thanks! |
|
|||
|
codeguard@gmail.com wrote:
> I could not find in postconf if there is a way to increase a timeout > for Address verification that makes > "Sender address rejected: unverified address: Address verification in > progress;" instantly on a slow network. I know, the mail will be > accepted at the other MTA's try, but it's bad solution for me :-( . So, > is there a way just to increase timeout? Thanks! Well, you knew the risks: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIF...ml#limitations What machine do you probe for address verification? If it's an Exchange machine, you should probably go for LDAP queries (with local query cache) or regular exports from Exchange and put them in your postfix config. The latter will work for other machines as well. Peter -- http://www.boosten.org Mail: peter at boosten dot org |
|
|||
|
"""Peter Boosten ΠΙΣΑΜ(Α):
""" > codeguard@gmail.com wrote: > > I could not find in postconf if there is a way to increase a timeout > > for Address verification that makes > > "Sender address rejected: unverified address: Address verification in > > progress;" instantly on a slow network. I know, the mail will be > > accepted at the other MTA's try, but it's bad solution for me :-( . So, > > is there a way just to increase timeout? Thanks! > Well, you knew the risks: > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIF...ml#limitations Yes, I've already read this man. But where is the timeout value? ;-) I could find only a DELAY: address_verify_poll_delay = 10s And I set it to 10 seconds. Where could I find the _maximum_ delay, this just sends query and stops smtpd for 10 seconds. > What machine do you probe for address verification? > If it's an Exchange machine, you should probably go for LDAP queries (with > local query cache) or regular exports from Exchange and put them in your > postfix config. The latter will work for other machines as well. I probe sender's server, this could be any MTA in the world, so ldap is not applicable ;-) As I say, my only need is timeout, because at this net we have only fully loaded 115 kbit/s network on async modem, with poor line quality :-) Thank you for your reply. |
|
|||
|
Peter Boosten wrote:
> I don't think address verification was meant for this: it's the receiving > MTA's job to verify if recipients exist or not. As I read it, he's trying to use the sender verification feature, rather than the recipient verification: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIF...#forged_sender and seeing problems because of a slow Internet connection. -- Greg |
|
|||
|
Codeguard <codeguard@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I probe sender's server, this could be any MTA in the world, so ldap is > not applicable ;-) As I say, my only need is timeout, because at this > net we have only fully loaded 115 kbit/s network on async modem, with > poor line quality :-) > I don't think address verification was meant for this: it's the receiving MTA's job to verify if recipients exist or not. These probes might get you on a blacklist. We use address verification because our postfix relays to an Exchange-box, our postfix has no idea what users might exist on our Exchange. This prevents unnecessary NDRs or messages hanging in the queue. Peter -- http://www.boosten.org Mail: peter at boosten dot org |
|
|||
|
Greg Hackney <hackney@swbell.net> wrote:
> Peter Boosten wrote: > >> I don't think address verification was meant for this: it's the receiving >> MTA's job to verify if recipients exist or not. > > > As I read it, he's trying to use the sender verification feature, rather > than the recipient verification: > > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIF...#forged_sender > > and seeing problems because of a slow Internet connection. > You're right. I overlooked one word :-s Peter -- http://www.boosten.org Mail: peter at boosten dot org |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|