This is a discussion on Re: Discard Redux within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 13:07 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > David Cary Hart wrote: > > It ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 13:07 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> David Cary Hart wrote: > > It would (IMHO) really be a good idea to provide a discard_rbl_client > > facility. I would prefer not to reject from Korea and PRC blackholes > > since that information allows them to list-wash. Furthermore, a discard > > looks like a delivery which toys with some of the economics of spammers, > > their affiliate programs and list vendors. > > FWIW I don't agree with your reasoning, David. I doubt they really are > pruning their lists. And I object to giving my bandwidth to spammers. I have a deal with Wietse. He doesn't teach managers how to sell stuff and I don't write Postfix code. That said, I'm not entirely sure about the difference in bandwidth and cycles for discard in contrast to reject. > > Of course as they say on SPAM-L (which is where this discussion would > more properly fit :) ) "your server, your rules." Still, I am curious as > to why you think Korean and Chinese spammers would be doing this? ROKSO > seems to indicate that most major spammers are from the USA, even those > who happen to use Asian network resources. I was using that as an example. IMO there are very few Korean and Chinese spammers. I think that there is a mostly non-Asian spam community using Korean and Chinese "bullet proof" hosting. Gillespie (cheapbulletproof.com) recently started hosting spammers from the Czech Republic. I DO believe that there are some rather well organized operations that list wash. I also believe that there are well organized operations that compile lists for resale. Discarding spam from known bulk mailers and list compilers, IMO, deteriorates their efforts since they are unable to know their real delivery rate. With respect to Postfix, providing the facility at some point is a function of both complexity and triage. I would not suggest that I could appreciate either of those variables. I lack the coding skills and only the developers can understand the priorities (which have always seemed well organized). At some point, I suspect that it will be done. -- Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.htm Kill Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm Today's Spam Trap Adds: http://www.TQMcube.com/BlockedToday RBLDNSD HowTo: http://www.TQMcube.com/rbldnsd.htm |