This is a discussion on Re: ISP converting to automation with LDAP within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:23:15 +0530 Devdas Bhagat <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org> wrote: > > ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:23:15 +0530
Devdas Bhagat <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org> wrote: > > What about IMAP - what is the big difference between the 3 main > > contenders? > > > UW-imap: Uses mbox files, is good for a small site with small > mailboxes and few users. Hard to use with virtual accounts. > While there have been no recent scares it had quite a bad security history at one point. Personally I would not touch it for a server on the public internet. > Courier-imap: Uses maildir, is fantastic at scaling up, and quite good > at virtual accounts. > Offers POP3 as well. > Cyrus-IMAP: Uses an indexed MH store, gives up the ability to use > standard Unix tools in return for higher performance. Has its own user > database. > > There are also Dovecot, binc-imap, and the various pop3d servers out > there. > I'm a little surprised at an ISP offering IMAP, most prefer POP3 so that they don't have to worry about users forgetting to delete read mail. Your system, your choice, and I definitely prefer IMAP for corporate servers, but for an ISP it can tie up one devil of a lot of storage. -- I do not reply to directly addressed mail unless it is clearly a matter that should be dealt with off-list. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|