This is a discussion on Re: ISP converting to automation with LDAP within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; Ron Wheeler wrote: > Jorey Bump wrote: >> But I'm not responding to bash Microsoft, I just want ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Jorey Bump wrote: >> But I'm not responding to bash Microsoft, I just want to pipe in with >> my own experience that email software (MTA/LDA/MUA) is still extremely >> flexible, diverse and sometimes difficult for a good reason: So is the >> user base. >> > I am not convinced that it is as diverse as the implementations end up. > If each one of us is reinventing the wheel, you are going to get a lot > of different looking wheels. Wietse is probably the best qualified to comment on this. I'd be surprised if he added features to postfix just because he was bored and had a lot of free time. :) Keep in mind that email software is communications software, and human communications are very diverse. Compare this to something like climate control software, where the parameter range is extremely narrow. You could probably design a climate control system that can be used in any dwelling in the world, easily predicting most scenarios. The status quo proves that this isn't the case for email, however, because the parameters for communication haven't been fully identified and implemented in software. Until then, we'll continue to grapple with features that were added for purely nontechnical reasons (aliases, authentication/authorization, spam/virus detection, etc.) according to the needs of our particular environments. |