This is a discussion on Re: ISP converting to automation with LDAP within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; I am really having trouble with the idea that there are 50 ways to setup an ISP using Postfix. I ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I am really having trouble with the idea that there are 50 ways to setup
an ISP using Postfix. I am almost sure that 90-95% of Postfix installations could be almost exactly the same and the user's would have the same or better level of satisfaction as they do now. There has to be a consensus by now about what constitutes an appropriate core setup for an ISP or major corporation using LDAP, Postfix, IMAP and SASL/PAM. We seem to have narrowed the web server down to 2 (IIS and Apache hold 95% of the market between them) and we are all happy about that. The shakeout in development architectures is still a long way off but that is another story. I understand that each ISP or IT department will want to create an USP by adding features and applications but just as I can do this with Microsoft Server, I should be able to get the core functionality up and running with a set of open source packages glued together by a uniform set of configuration files that look almost the same as everyone elses. Then, augment the LDAP schema and basic configuration to support my value added applications. How many ways are there to write an email address? It is not like the old days with sendmail supporting uucp and 50 other address schemes. How many ways are there to support virtual domains? Maybe we can start with a comparison chart of different virtual domain architectures. What about IMAP - what is the big difference between the 3 main contenders? If we can do this, there will be an incentive for open source projects like web service support for administrative tasks and more administrative tools. The current "every man for himself" environment is extremely costly and contributes to Microsoft's ability to claim a lower TCO than Linux. Ron Victor Duchovni wrote: >On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:19:20AM -0400, Ron Wheeler wrote: > > > >>Excellent advice. >> >>One thing that has puzzled me for a while, in the wonderful world of >>Postfix Sasl Imap and LDAP is that there does not seem to be a "best >>practice" guide for someone wanting to set up an ISP or a multidomain >>service. There are bits and pieces of information everywhere with >>postfix.org probably the most complete. openldap.org has taken a >>different approach with this type of discussion being verbotten which is >>why the interoperability forum was set up but it has no www site or >>repository for information. >> >> >> > >I've answered this question before. Can't find the reference, you may >have more luck. The basic idea is that there is no one size fits all >solution outside the confines of monolothic integrated systems. > >The best advice I can give is: strive for simplicity of design. > > > |