This is a discussion on Re: hash vs. sql lookup map speeds within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; Zitat von Sven Riedel <sr@baghus.net>: > Hi, > > I've read several times that postfix-&...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Zitat von Sven Riedel <sr@baghus.net>:
> Hi, > > I've read several times that postfix-"native" index files are > a lot faster than SQL lookups. While I no problems believing > that statement for maps up to a certain number of entries (below > several thousand, say), I am a little curious if there is a > certain number of entries where the lookup speed is faster > in SQL than in the index files. > > As a concrete scenario: Say you're using postfix as a > mail gateway to a set of domains that have tens of thousands > of valid email addresses. Would it still make sense to > keep these in postfix hash-tables or would MySQL/Postgres make > more sense then? Maybe have a look here : http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ld....edu.tw&rnum=1 Regards Andreas |