Re: Alternate checks for reinjected mail

On Monday, May 30, 2005 at 00:46 CEST,
Jorey Bump <list@joreybump.com> wrote:

> Magnus B=E4ck wrote:
>
> > No. The script will return an exit status that will cause Postfix to
> > bounce the message.
>=20
> No, Postfix does not bounce the message.

Yes it will.

> > You assume too much. Postfix expects the exit status of such scripts
> > to be one of the constants defined in sysexits.h.
>=20
> I've tested this. If spamd is not running, spamc logs an error and=20
> postfix delivers the message without scanning by SpamAssassin.

Please read my postings. I'm not talking about the case when spamd isn't
running.

> Is there another possibility that you think I should guard against?

Yes, the case when either of the programs won't start, or in general
any cases that may cause the filtering script to return an exit status
that isn't defined in sysexits.h.

--=20
Magnus B=E4ck
magnus@dsek.lth.se