This is a discussion on Re: two instances of postfix within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:25:38PM -0400, D. Walsh wrote: > > On May 28, 2005, at ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:25:38PM -0400, D. Walsh wrote:
> > On May 28, 2005, at 12:04 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > >On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 06:05:53PM -0400, D. Walsh wrote: > > > > > >>mustangrestomods:~ websrvr$ postconf -c /etc/postfix -n > >>inet_interfaces = all > >> > >>mustangrestomods:~ websrvr$ postconf -c /etc/postfixalt -n > >>inet_interfaces = 10.1.100.11 > >> > > > >On many systems binding "all" interfaces (0/0) precludes, for good > >security reasons, later binding some of the interfaces for the same > >port > >in another process. So you must exclude the 10.1.100.11 inteface from > >the inet_interaces list of the default Postfix instance. > > > >-- > > Viktor. > > OK, I made this change and it still doesn't run, now what? > Stop/start both instances, and always report something concrete. "Doesn't run" is not especially specific. Find all log messages, if errors are logged to a different log file than notices and warnings, search all relevant files. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20p ostfix-users> |