This is a discussion on Re: Feasability of E-Mail Laundering Service within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; --nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
--nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 25 May 2005 05.58, Lorrie Wood wrote: > A friend of mine has an account with an ISP whose spam filtering isn't > as good as mine. What I want to do (with her complete permission) is to > run a mail laundering service: I pick up mail from her ISP, process it > through my postfix et al, and deposit it into an account on my machine. The big problem with spam filtering like this is: at the time where the=20 filtering occurs, you have already received the spam. So, your=20 alternatives are: - tag it (and file it into a spam folder.) The only sane way, imnsho - bu= t=20 obviously the big disadvantage is that the user still sees the spam and has= =20 to look through it to make sure nothing non-spammy gets deleted because it= =20 was tagged as spam for some reason. - bounce it back to the sender. While some people unfortunately still do= =20 this, this is the worst thing you can do. The sender address on spam mails= =20 is almost always faked, so you're bouncing spam to innocent bystanders. - delete it. While this apparently solves the problem, you occasionally=20 *will* have a non-spam message which gets deleted because it looked like=20 spam. For me, the possibility of deleting a non-spam mail is inacceptable= =20 =2D email currently is a quite reliable tool, and I want to keep it that wa= y. Summary: the only reasonable thing you can offer your friend is to run the= =20 mail through spamassassin/dspam/whatever and file the spam into a folder of= =20 its own. (NOTE: contrary to spam, trojans/viruses can be recognized with virtually n= o=20 false positives, given a decent scanner, so silently deleting trojans can=20 be reasonable - at least until the next malware pops up which attaches=20 itself to legit payload.) cheers =2D- vbi --nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481 iKcEABECAGcFAkKUJLhgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZW dhbC9ncGcvZW1h aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6FhoAnjDcBpGI07 CdvhN3bwLQYW1E fbb1AJ9bBV4XpfqU3DdJjgWENbU3N18EAQ== =JbwV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq-- |