Re: Feasability of E-Mail Laundering Service

This is a discussion on Re: Feasability of E-Mail Laundering Service within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; --nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > mailing.postfix.users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2005
Adrian von Bidder
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Feasability of E-Mail Laundering Service

--nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 25 May 2005 05.58, Lorrie Wood wrote:

> A friend of mine has an account with an ISP whose spam filtering isn't
> as good as mine. What I want to do (with her complete permission) is to
> run a mail laundering service: I pick up mail from her ISP, process it
> through my postfix et al, and deposit it into an account on my machine.


The big problem with spam filtering like this is: at the time where the=20
filtering occurs, you have already received the spam. So, your=20
alternatives are:
- tag it (and file it into a spam folder.) The only sane way, imnsho - bu=
t=20
obviously the big disadvantage is that the user still sees the spam and has=
=20
to look through it to make sure nothing non-spammy gets deleted because it=
=20
was tagged as spam for some reason.
- bounce it back to the sender. While some people unfortunately still do=
=20
this, this is the worst thing you can do. The sender address on spam mails=
=20
is almost always faked, so you're bouncing spam to innocent bystanders.
- delete it. While this apparently solves the problem, you occasionally=20
*will* have a non-spam message which gets deleted because it looked like=20
spam. For me, the possibility of deleting a non-spam mail is inacceptable=
=20
=2D email currently is a quite reliable tool, and I want to keep it that wa=
y.

Summary: the only reasonable thing you can offer your friend is to run the=
=20
mail through spamassassin/dspam/whatever and file the spam into a folder of=
=20
its own.

(NOTE: contrary to spam, trojans/viruses can be recognized with virtually n=
o=20
false positives, given a decent scanner, so silently deleting trojans can=20
be reasonable - at least until the next malware pops up which attaches=20
itself to legit payload.)

cheers
=2D- vbi

--nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: get my key from http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

iKcEABECAGcFAkKUJLhgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZW dhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJECqqZti935l6FhoAnjDcBpGI07 CdvhN3bwLQYW1E
fbb1AJ9bBV4XpfqU3DdJjgWENbU3N18EAQ==
=JbwV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1328080.Qqmg5pl8nq--
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0