This is a discussion on Re: NOQUEUE using check_recipient_access and FILTER action within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Thursday, May 05, 2005 at 09:26 CEST, Sven Riedel <sr@baghus.net> wrote: > I'm ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Thursday, May 05, 2005 at 09:26 CEST,
Sven Riedel <sr@baghus.net> wrote: > I'm using the check_recipient_access FILTER action to multiplex > incoming mails to different mail filters, depending on the recipient. What happens if a message has two recipients who, according to your rules, should get different filtering treatment? > Postfix logs these incoming mails as=20 > NOQUEUE: filter: RCPT from {senderhost}[192.168.1.1]:=20 > <bla@test.de>: Recipient address triggers FILTER=20 > sweep:[127.0.0.1]:10050; from=3D<sr@XXXXX> to=3D<bla@test.de>=20 > proto=3DSMTP helo=3D<bla> >=20 > The thing that made me a bit nervous was the "NOQUEUE" part of the log > entry, since this implies to me that when postfix can't hand off the > mail to the mailfilter, it will in turn reply with a [45]50 to the > upstream sender - since the mail hasn't been queued by postfix. NOQUEUE just means that Postfix has not yet assigned a queue id for this message. A queue id is assigned when the first recipient is accepted. [...] --=20 Magnus B=E4ck magnus@dsek.lth.se |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|