This is a discussion on Re: Header Checks, examples? within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:21:35AM -0800, Michael Nguyen wrote: > From: "Victor Duchovni" <...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:21:35AM -0800, Michael Nguyen wrote:
> From: "Victor Duchovni" <Victor.Duchovni@MorganStanley.com> > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:48:27PM -0800, Michael Nguyen wrote: > > [snip] > > > Set content_filter to by default filter all mail into the filter server, > > if the header is present (how do you know it is not forged???) use > > FILTER smtp:[127.0.0.1]:20025 to inject the mail via SMTP right back > > into an smtpd/cleanup pair with content_filter and this header check > > disabled (directly to whatever destination the filter usually delivers, > > thereby bypassing the filter). Beats me as to why this is a good idea > > (it would not be for A/V, but it could be for anti-spam, if the header > > is only added to identified spam). > > Well, it works except for one thing. The service is requiring that I > re-write the recipient address. I would like to do this, but have it be > triggered via the header_check. > Architecture from hell. Dump it. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20p ostfix-users> |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|