This is a discussion on Re: Address extensions and virtual SQL users within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Postfix has two programs that deliver ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix has two programs that deliver to mailboxes: local(8) and > virtual(8). In recent Postfix versions, both understand address > extensions. > > Neither of the two will name mailbox files after the extension. > That would be a terrible security problem where miscreants could > pollute the mailspool with lots of junk file names. > However it is possible with Postfix 2.1 and later in virtual_mailbox_maps to explicitly define a mapping from address+spam to an alternate maildir. This is not really an option with local delivery, unless the OP uses: mailbox_transport = virtual, in which case the above still applies. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20p ostfix-users> |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|