Re: Address extensions and virtual SQL users

This is a discussion on Re: Address extensions and virtual SQL users within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Postfix has two programs that deliver ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Mail Servers and Related > mailing.postfix.users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2005
Victor Duchovni
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Address extensions and virtual SQL users

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:54:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:

> Postfix has two programs that deliver to mailboxes: local(8) and
> virtual(8). In recent Postfix versions, both understand address
> extensions.
>
> Neither of the two will name mailbox files after the extension.
> That would be a terrible security problem where miscreants could
> pollute the mailspool with lots of junk file names.
>


However it is possible with Postfix 2.1 and later in virtual_mailbox_maps
to explicitly define a mapping from address+spam to an alternate maildir.

This is not really an option with local delivery, unless the OP uses:
mailbox_transport = virtual, in which case the above still applies.

--
Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20p ostfix-users>

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0