This is a discussion on Re: postfix on a fedora core 1 within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; petre@kgb.ro wrote: > I must install postfix on a fedora core 1 distro and what I found on &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
petre@kgb.ro wrote:
> I must install postfix on a fedora core 1 distro and what I found on > rpmfind.net is "Fedora Core Development for i386" - version 2.1.5 of > postfix; is this rpm what I'm looking for, or is it better to install it > from sources ? > > thanks in advance, I've always felt that packaged software installs are a good way to manage binaries on your system and I install very little software any other way. That said, you should be aware of what patches the packager has chosen to apply to the orginal source and use discretion when reporting bugs/problems. If you are happy building from a source rpm, you may also want to disabling some of these patches in the spec file if you they are unnecessary in your install. If you do get a problem with packaged software installs, see if you can reproduce the problem with a clean unpatched build of the latest source release. Doing so you will often get a better assistance from the list and you will have at least ruled out one cause for yourself. Wietse and many other software authors often don't appreciate bug reports caused by the application of additional patches to their software or where vendor patching/packaging may be implicated. If the problem only appears with the packaged software then talk to the package distributor through their normal support channels. Or if this is not appropriate then talk to the package creator (often listed in the changelog) of the package. -- Robert Brooks, Network Manager, Cable & Wireless UK <robb@hyperlink-interactive.co.uk> http://hyperlink-interactive.co.uk/ Tel: +44 (0)20 7339 8600 Fax: +44 (0)20 7339 8601 - Help Microsoft stamp out piracy. Give Linux to a friend today! - |