This is a discussion on Re: reply length 5303 > buffer length 4096 ? within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:30:36PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > How did you arrive at the ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:30:36PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> How did you arrive at the number of 5? This would be the number > of MX addresses that Postfix will use from the MX lookup. If all > addresses are dead then no mail goes through, even if the 6th MX > address is OK. > I think we arrived at a number in the five to 10 range on the assumption that all hosts time out, and some tuning to handle plausible deferred queue sizes. The hand-waving arguments are in the archives. The key factor is of course latency, so indeed we want a total connect timeout budget for each delivery, and if MX hosts refuse service, one can try them all, while timeouts would lead to fewer MX hosts being tried... In practice I don't think that moving the limit into the time domain is necessary... -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20p ostfix-users> |