Re: Ignore attachements with body_checks?

At 02:36 PM 11/11/2004, Kevin Collins wrote:

>The biggest problem with this is that the attachment is seen as a giant
>string of ASCII garbage that *sometimes* spell words that my
>'body_checks' are hitting. Like the other day I had a legit e-mail with
>an attachment that got killed because of the string "POrN" was in that
>random conglomeration that the attachment was encoded with.
>
>I want Postfix to kill the e-mails that do NOT have attachments, but do
>have the words "porn" in them.
>
>If I could get postfix to simply not apply the rules in 'body_checks' to
>ALL the e-mails that have attachments with them, that would accomplish
>what I'm after.


Add this near the top of your body_checks. It prevents postfix from
looking for matches within base64 encoded lines.

# Skip over base 64 encoded blocks. This saves lots of CPU cycles.
# Expressions by Liviu Daia, amended by Victor Duchovni.
~^[[:alnum:]+/]{60,}\ *$~ OK

--
Noel Jones