This is a discussion on Re: SASL libraries not taken in account when compiling on AIX within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; Am Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 16:22 schrieb Jerome Walter: > > Check, which Mechanisms do you have installed in /...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Am Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 16:22 schrieb Jerome Walter:
> > Check, which Mechanisms do you have installed in /usr/lib/sasl2. > > root@mail:/home/walter# ls /usr/lib/sasl2 > deactivated libcrammd5.la liblogin.la libplain.la > libanonymous.a libdigestmd5.a libotp.a libsasldb.a > libanonymous.la libdigestmd5.la libotp.la libsasldb.la > libcrammd5.a liblogin.a libplain.a smtpd.conf The la-Files are Textfiles, show one of them, please. What says: # file libplain.a > Should be enough ;) But should also be restricted by mech_list in > smtpd.conf > > > Check if Postfix filters some of them smtpd_sasl_security_options. > > Show "postconf -n". > > No smtpd_sasl_security_options. > > postconf -n | grep smtpd_sasl > smtpd_sasl_application_name = smtpd > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no > smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $mydomain Check it please with: # postconf smtpd_sasl_security_options > > I hope, it comes clear with the static libsasl. Or maybe the mechanisms > > are included, too? (horror) > > I fear. This AIX is definitively alive and trying to get me mad ;) > > is there a way to check ? Some labels that would appear from sasl being > present in smtpd ? Yes a function "plain_server_mech_new" is only in the plain-plugin. If this is in your Postfix... -- Andreas |