Re: "Local whitelist" for the next restriction possible?

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Noel Jones wrote:

> The only catch I can think of is the feature would, of course, have to
> distinguish between a DUNNO result and a real "not found" and only return
> the default result when the key is really not found.
>

This already works. DUNNO is internally implemented separately from "not
found" so it is possible to have a "found" DUNNO in addition to a not
found "DUNNO".

1_0_4-20010808 20010729
1_0_4-20010808
1_0_4-20010808 Bugfix: the not yet announced DUNNO access table lookup
1_0_4-20010808 result did not prevent lookups with substrings of the same
1_0_4-20010808 lookup key. Found by Victor Duchovni, morganstanley.com.

--
Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20p ostfix-users>