RE: Upgrading from Postfix 2.0.18 to 2.1.1

Make install solve my problem.=20
I'll take a look why the upgrade target didn't worked.
TLS Patch is released for Postfix 2.1.0 not Postfix 2.1.1.
Can I still use it in Postfix 2.1.1??=20
Won't my postfix be instable as Source Code of Postfix 2.1.0=20
Is different from 2.1.1?

Getting another problem. (Not really a problem but I don't like =
warnings).

Getting this warning when upgrading from 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 :=20

Jun 13 21:31:41 ABXCompaq postfix/trivial-rewrite[5809]: warning: do not =
list domain dsi.example.fr in BOTH virtual_mailbox_domains and=20
relay_domains

The warning is very clear but in my postfix configuration it isn't the =
case.

alias_database =3D hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps =3D hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients =3D no
command_directory =3D /usr/sbin
config_directory =3D /etc/postfix
daemon_directory =3D /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level =3D 2
home_mailbox =3D Maildir/
inet_interfaces =3D all
mail_owner =3D postfix
mailq_path =3D /usr/bin/mailq
manpage_directory =3D /usr/local/man
mydomain =3D example.fr
myhostname =3D abxcompaq.example.fr
mynetworks =3D 192.168.0.0/16, 10.33.0.0/16
myorigin =3D $mydomain
newaliases_path =3D /usr/bin/newaliases
queue_directory =3D /var/spool/postfix
relay_domains =3D $mydomain
sample_directory =3D /etc/postfix
sendmail_path =3D /usr/sbin/sendmail
setgid_group =3D postdrop
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =3D permit_sasl_authenticated, =
permit_mynetworks, reject_non_fqdn_sender, =
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, =
reject_unauth_destination, =
reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable =3D yes
smtpd_sasl_local_domain =3D dsi.example.fr
transport_maps =3D hash:/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code =3D 450
virtual_alias_maps =3D hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
virtual_gid_maps =3D static:1007
virtual_mailbox_base =3D /var/vhosts
virtual_mailbox_domains =3D dsi.example.fr
virtual_mailbox_maps =3D hash:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
virtual_minimum_uid =3D 100
virtual_uid_maps =3D static:1006

In fact, my the directive relay_domains is set to example.fr=20
And virtual_mailbox_domains Is set to dsi.example.fr
Which is a different domain?

Isn't it due to the fact the virtual domain is the child domain of the=20
Relay domain?

Thanks for you help,

King Regards,

Farid.
-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: owner-postfix-users@postfix.org =
[mailto:owner-postfix-users@postfix.org] De la part de Noel Jones
Envoy=E9=A0: samedi 12 juin 2004 00:23
=C0=A0: postfix-users@postfix.org
Objet=A0: Re: Upgrading from Postfix 2.0.18 to 2.1.1

At 05:05 PM 6/11/04, IZEM Farid wrote:
>While trying make upgrade, I get this problem:
>
>postfix-install: Error: "" should be "no" or an absolute path name

Apparently either html_directory or readme_directory is set to empty in=20
your main.cf.
Either remove them from main.cf or set them to an absolute path to a=20
directory where to store the files.

If you then get other errors, you will need to do a "make install" =
instead.

>Another thing, where can I found TLS Patch for Postfix 2.1.1?? Hasn't =
it
>been released yet??

Yes, the patch was released about the same time postfix 2.1.1 was=20
released. Available from the usual places. You can find the links on =
the=20
postfix.org/addon page or in google.



--=20
Noel Jones

-
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo@postfix.org?body=3Dunsubscribe%2 0postfix-users>=20