This is a discussion on Re: Im very disapointed with postfix mailinglist! within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; On Monday 10 May 2004 14:24, Dan Hollis, Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.ne= t> =20 wrote: &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Monday 10 May 2004 14:24, Dan Hollis, Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.ne=
t> =20 wrote: > I've been subscribed to the list for several years, and I've watched it > degenerate from a friendly helpful list into a list of cranky curmudgeons > who delight in assaulting noobs. > So have I , but I see it quite differently. While every list has its "Mine= is=20 the only right way" folks, most of the regulars here don't fall into that=20 category. That said, postfix is evolving and there are an ever-growing list of things= =20 one can configure. This results in a broader range of issues and questions= =20 that are dealt with. =20 So, when someone asks why they can't (send|receive|reject|discard|filter) m= ail=20 (to|from) (their own|other) network without providing anything to enable a= =20 sensible answer, the reaction might be less than warm and fuzzy. OTOH, when a newbie gets a reply of "Logs? postconf -n?", I bet the first=20 thing he or she says is, "Huh? I've probably said much and solved nothing, but I think this is a great lis= t. =20 At least until the next person asks which RBLs are good and which are bad.= =20 ;-) =2D-=20 Robin Lynn Frank Director of Operations, Paradigm-Omega, LLC =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =46rom the Room-Full-of-Monkeys Typing Pool: We used to have leaders and statesmen. Now we have America's Funniest Video= s. |