This is a discussion on RE: SASL and content_filter within the mailing.postfix.users forums, part of the Mail Servers and Related category; I figured both of my requests weren't possible, but I figured I'd ask since it seems useful. Perhaps ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I figured both of my requests weren't possible, but I figured I'd ask since
it seems useful. Perhaps my best option for now is to run 2 instances of Postfix on our servers... one for our local users to relay and one as the front-end MX. Bill -----Original Message----- From: owner-postfix-users@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-users@postfix.org]On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 6:04 PM To: Bill Boebel Cc: Postfix-Users Subject: Re: SASL and content_filter Bill Boebel: > Similarly I'd also like to tell anvil to ignore connections that are > authenticated via SASL... or have a separate anvil rate_limit for SASL > sessions. Now that would require that Postfix predicts the future. Let me know whet you have figured that out. People, don't use the rate and count limit for normal mail. They are meant only for stopping rampant abuse. Wietse |