Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Defining a named worker with mod_jk2

This is a discussion on Defining a named worker with mod_jk2 within the Linux Web Servers forums, part of the Web Server and Related Forums category; With mod_jk I did this in workers.properties to define a worker called foo: worker.list=other_workers, foo worker.foo....


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Web Server and Related Forums > Linux Web Servers

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2005
Henri Sivonen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Defining a named worker with mod_jk2

With mod_jk I did this in workers.properties to define a worker called
foo:

worker.list=other_workers, foo
worker.foo.port=8888
worker.foo.host=127.0.0.1
worker.foo.type=ajp13

How to do the equivalent thing in workers2.properties for mod_jk2?

(I could figure out workers.properties without docs but it appears
workers2.properties is too weird even with docs.)

--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2005
Juha Laiho
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Defining a named worker with mod_jk2

Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> said:
>With mod_jk I did this in workers.properties to define a worker called
>foo:

....
>How to do the equivalent thing in workers2.properties for mod_jk2?


No help for this, except to point out that development of mod_jk2
has been frozen, and efforts are again directed to mod_jk. So,
unless you have some specific reason to use mod_jk2, just revert
back to mod_jk.
--
Wolf a.k.a. Juha Laiho Espoo, Finland
(GC 3.0) GIT d- s+: a C++ ULSH++++$ P++@ L+++ E- W+$@ N++ !K w !O !M V
PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(+) t- 5 !X R !tv b+ !DI D G e+ h---- r+++ y++++
"...cancel my subscription to the resurrection!" (Jim Morrison)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-25-2005
Henri Sivonen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Defining a named worker with mod_jk2

In article <dektfs$36s$1@ichaos.ichaos-int>,
Juha Laiho <Juha.Laiho@iki.fi> wrote:

> So,
> unless you have some specific reason to use mod_jk2, just revert
> back to mod_jk.


Choosing mod_jk over mod_jk2 is not in my bargaining power in this case.
Does mod_jk work with Apache 2.x?

--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-26-2005
Juha Laiho
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Defining a named worker with mod_jk2

Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> said:
>In article <dektfs$36s$1@ichaos.ichaos-int>,
> Juha Laiho <Juha.Laiho@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> So,
>> unless you have some specific reason to use mod_jk2, just revert
>> back to mod_jk.

>
>Choosing mod_jk over mod_jk2 is not in my bargaining power in this case.
>Does mod_jk work with Apache 2.x?


I have stil been keeping with Apache 1.3.x, so no first-hand
experience there -- Google references indicate strongly that
mod_jk would work with Apache2. Also, reading the latest Tomcat
docs for a first time in a while, there is a mention of using
Apache2 with mod_proxy (apparently a separate add-on for
pre-2.2 Apache versions) with AJP protocol support enabled.
So looks like mod_proxy is extended to also handle Tomcat
connectivity.
--
Wolf a.k.a. Juha Laiho Espoo, Finland
(GC 3.0) GIT d- s+: a C++ ULSH++++$ P++@ L+++ E- W+$@ N++ !K w !O !M V
PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(+) t- 5 !X R !tv b+ !DI D G e+ h---- r+++ y++++
"...cancel my subscription to the resurrection!" (Jim Morrison)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0