How secure is this to access par port as none-root user ?

This is a discussion on How secure is this to access par port as none-root user ? within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi. Here is a article about accessing a parallel port as none-root user in linux. http://linuxgazette.net/112/...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Linux Security

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008
hihihi
 
Posts: n/a
Default How secure is this to access par port as none-root user ?


Hi.

Here is a article about accessing a parallel port as none-root user in
linux.
http://linuxgazette.net/112/radcliffe.html

Is it as secure as mentioned in this article ?

Thanks..

--
hihihi is the username, wanadoo the domain, nl the country.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008
s. keeling
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How secure is this to access par port as none-root user ?

hihihi <See@signature-at-the-bottom-of-the-message.invalid>:
>
> Here is a article about accessing a parallel port as non-root user in
> linux.
> http://linuxgazette.net/112/radcliffe.html
>
> Is it as secure as mentioned in this article ?


"The I/O enabling program then drops down to the privileges of the
real user who started it using the C functions setgid() and
setuid(). These functions do not effect the I/O access permissions
or process priority."

"The I/O enabling program then loads the application program over
its own code space by using the C function execvp(). This means
the application program is now running with user (not root)
privileges, and with I/O access limited to only those I/O ports
enabled by the trusted I/O enabling program."

'Sounds good to me. Careful who you let at that SUID program and
check it (md5sum cf. read-only copy) regularly, but I see nothing
egregiously wrong in this. It's root who's making all this happen, so
it's fine with the OS. I haven't read the whole thing so I don't
really know what his intent is. I do wonder if there's other, less
intrusive, ways to get what he wants, such as creating a new group
which owns that SUID thing and add the user to that group and make it
SGID instead? That may just be quibbling, and no better than the
original; speculating.

The LG editorial staff are pretty sharp people, and they're careful
about what they publish. I'd imagine this one received their usual
scrutiny.

Aside, why is Linux Journal still alive after what they tried to do
to LG? :-P


--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0