This is a discussion on How secure is this to access par port as none-root user ? within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi. Here is a article about accessing a parallel port as none-root user in linux. http://linuxgazette.net/112/...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi. Here is a article about accessing a parallel port as none-root user in linux. http://linuxgazette.net/112/radcliffe.html Is it as secure as mentioned in this article ? Thanks.. -- hihihi is the username, wanadoo the domain, nl the country. |
|
|||
|
hihihi <See@signature-at-the-bottom-of-the-message.invalid>:
> > Here is a article about accessing a parallel port as non-root user in > linux. > http://linuxgazette.net/112/radcliffe.html > > Is it as secure as mentioned in this article ? "The I/O enabling program then drops down to the privileges of the real user who started it using the C functions setgid() and setuid(). These functions do not effect the I/O access permissions or process priority." "The I/O enabling program then loads the application program over its own code space by using the C function execvp(). This means the application program is now running with user (not root) privileges, and with I/O access limited to only those I/O ports enabled by the trusted I/O enabling program." 'Sounds good to me. Careful who you let at that SUID program and check it (md5sum cf. read-only copy) regularly, but I see nothing egregiously wrong in this. It's root who's making all this happen, so it's fine with the OS. I haven't read the whole thing so I don't really know what his intent is. I do wonder if there's other, less intrusive, ways to get what he wants, such as creating a new group which owns that SUID thing and add the user to that group and make it SGID instead? That may just be quibbling, and no better than the original; speculating. The LG editorial staff are pretty sharp people, and they're careful about what they publish. I'd imagine this one received their usual scrutiny. Aside, why is Linux Journal still alive after what they tried to do to LG? :-P -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|