This is a discussion on Re: unknown certificate authority error with bank site within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; On 2007-07-09, tester <test@none.invalid> wrote: > https://www.myctfs.com (a bank) gives me ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On 2007-07-09, tester <test@none.invalid> wrote:
> https://www.myctfs.com (a bank) gives me an "unknown > certificate authority" error. How serious a problem > is this? What should I tell the admin in order to get > the site fixed with as little argument as possible? > If you have access to a variety of OS+browsers, please > comment on which report a problem. > Hmm, they seem to be authenticated by VeriSign's Class 3 CA, which under normal circumstances should be "installed" by default in most web browsers / operating systems... my is that it's probably a configuration issue at your end. (Unless somebody is actively subjecting you to a man-in-the-middle attack; unlikely, but this is the sort of warning you'd expect to see in that case.) If it is a configuration issue with your system then I'd expect to see similar problems with a bunch of other sites, too. Check your web browser to ensure that VeriSign's CAs are installed (in Firefox, go to Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Encryption -> View Certificates -> Authorities). Mark -- Mark Shroyer http://markshroyer.com/ |
|
|||
|
I see this same error, with Firefox 2.0.0.4 and its set of certificates
loaded. I've got a lot of VeriSign certificates, but not that one. Since anyone can assert the certificate is from VeriSign, I'd be very leery of this one. I wouldn't connect to this site until I had got a very believable explanation from someone who knew what was going on. -- Steve Mark Shroyer wrote: > On 2007-07-09, tester <test@none.invalid> wrote: >> https://www.myctfs.com (a bank) gives me an "unknown >> certificate authority" error. How serious a problem >> is this? What should I tell the admin in order to get >> the site fixed with as little argument as possible? >> If you have access to a variety of OS+browsers, please >> comment on which report a problem. >> > > Hmm, they seem to be authenticated by VeriSign's Class 3 CA, which > under normal circumstances should be "installed" by default in most > web browsers / operating systems... my is that it's probably a > configuration issue at your end. (Unless somebody is actively > subjecting you to a man-in-the-middle attack; unlikely, but this is > the sort of warning you'd expect to see in that case.) > > If it is a configuration issue with your system then I'd expect to > see similar problems with a bunch of other sites, too. Check your > web browser to ensure that VeriSign's CAs are installed (in Firefox, > go to Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Encryption -> View > Certificates -> Authorities). > > Mark > |
|
|||
|
On 2007-07-09, Steve Sentoff <steve30401@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I see this same error, with Firefox 2.0.0.4 and its set of certificates > loaded. I've got a lot of VeriSign certificates, but not that one. > Since anyone can assert the certificate is from VeriSign, I'd be very > leery of this one. I wouldn't connect to this site until I had got a > very believable explanation from someone who knew what was going on. I was probably unclear about this point, but what I meant to say is that the site's certificate actually checks out as valid with my Firefox 2.0.0.4 default CA set. That is, assuming that I can trust the CA keys distributed with my copy of Firefox, the site I'm personally able to connect to at http://myctfs.com/ (which we can't necessarily trust to be the same site you're reaching at that address from your side of the network) is authenticated by VeriSign. But you're right, of course: if the original poster cannot personally verify this site's certificate, he should absolutely stay away until the company has given him a clear explanation of what's going on. That two people have reported problems verifying this site's identity is pretty darn suspicious... -- Mark Shroyer http://markshroyer.com/ |
|
|||
|
Mark Shroyer <usenet-mail@markshroyer.com>:
> On 2007-07-09, Steve Sentoff <steve30401@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I see this same error, with Firefox 2.0.0.4 and its set of certificates > > loaded. I've got a lot of VeriSign certificates, but not that one. > > Since anyone can assert the certificate is from VeriSign, I'd be very > > I was probably unclear about this point, but what I meant to say is > that the site's certificate actually checks out as valid with my > Firefox 2.0.0.4 default CA set. That is, assuming that I can trust > the CA keys distributed with my copy of Firefox, the site I'm > personally able to connect to at http://myctfs.com/ (which we can't > necessarily trust to be the same site you're reaching at that > address from your side of the network) is authenticated by VeriSign. > > But you're right, of course: if the original poster cannot > personally verify this site's certificate, he should absolutely stay > away until the company has given him a clear explanation of what's > going on. That two people have reported problems verifying this > site's identity is pretty darn suspicious... Three people. FF/Iceweasel 2.0.0.4 -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. |
|
|||
|
On 2007-07-09, s. keeling <keeling@nucleus.com> wrote:
> Mark Shroyer <usenet-mail@markshroyer.com>: [...] >> But you're right, of course: if the original poster cannot >> personally verify this site's certificate, he should absolutely stay >> away until the company has given him a clear explanation of what's >> going on. That two people have reported problems verifying this >> site's identity is pretty darn suspicious... > > Three people. FF/Iceweasel 2.0.0.4 I just tried again and am now being served the suspect certificate as well. I'd be less concerned if they clearly were accidentally serving some internal self-signed certificate; however, this cert's issuer DN that it is from VeriSign, even though it doesn't validate as such. So yeah, suspicious. -- Mark Shroyer http://markshroyer.com/ |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:29:47 +0000, tester wrote:
>> If it is a configuration issue with your system then I'd expect to >> see similar problems with a bunch of other sites, too. > > I haven't encountered any similar problems, and I've tried myctfs > while booted to separate systems with different browsers, using > same ISP connection. Can you suggest some test cases? > >> Check your web browser to ensure that VeriSign's CAs are installed (in >> Firefox, go to Edit -> Preferences -> Advanced -> Encryption -> View >> Certificates -> Authorities). > > With Firefox 2.0.0.4 I see 15 items listed under VeriSign, including > these 3 that match the "class 3" description: > > Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority | Builtin Object Token > Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G2 | Builtin Object Token > Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G3 | Builtin Object Token Don't know the answer to your specific question. However I think you might have already gotten it above. Would point out, am now using Firefox version 2.0.0.6, compared to your 2.0.0.4. Do a favor and go to Menu Bar >> Help >> Check for Updates. That option is currently unavailable to me (greyed out) for reasons unknown to me. There are of course other ways to update. I would put it on my own list to check if I were you, or even me. ;) |
|
|||
|
Mark Shroyer wrote:
> On 2007-07-09, tester <test@none.invalid> wrote: >> https://www.myctfs.com (a bank) gives me an "unknown >> certificate authority" error. How serious a problem >> is this? What should I tell the admin in order to get >> the site fixed with as little argument as possible? >> If you have access to a variety of OS+browsers, please >> comment on which report a problem. >> > > Hmm, they seem to be authenticated by VeriSign's Class 3 CA, ... > > If it is a configuration issue with your system then I'd expect to > see similar problems with a bunch of other sites, too. ... > > Mark > My school just renewed their VeriSign Class 3 web site certificate, and it has the same problem: https://hccadvisor.hccfl.edu/ The only think that struck me as odd was that the CA certificate doesn't seem to include the "CN" attribute. Only this and a few other VeriSign CA certificates are missing this. I thought the CN attribute was required? -Wayne |
|
|||
|
Wayne wrote:
> Mark Shroyer wrote: >> On 2007-07-09, tester <test@none.invalid> wrote: >>> https://www.myctfs.com (a bank) gives me an "unknown >>> certificate authority" error. How serious a problem >>> is this? What should I tell the admin in order to get >>> the site fixed with as little argument as possible? >>> If you have access to a variety of OS+browsers, please >>> comment on which report a problem. >>> >> Hmm, they seem to be authenticated by VeriSign's Class 3 CA, ... >> >> If it is a configuration issue with your system then I'd expect to >> see similar problems with a bunch of other sites, too. ... >> >> Mark >> > > My school just renewed their VeriSign Class 3 web site certificate, > and it has the same problem: > > https://hccadvisor.hccfl.edu/ > > The only think that struck me as odd was that the CA certificate > doesn't seem to include the "CN" attribute. Only this > and a few other VeriSign CA certificates are missing this. > I thought the CN attribute was required? > > -Wayne I decided to live chat with Verisign on this. They checked, escalated, checked, and found the problem is the web site needs to install an intermediate certificate: Jeff S: It appears that the Intermediate CA certificate has not been installed on the web server. Jeff S: You will need to obtain the Secure Site Pro Certificate from this page here: http://www.verisign.com/support/veri...-ca/index.html -Wayne |