This is a discussion on successfully installed openssl on hosted server - host says there i sno security unless I buy separate certificate - is that right? within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; I successfully installed openssl on hosted server. The host company says that offers no security or encryption unless I buy ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I successfully installed openssl on hosted server. The host company says
that offers no security or encryption unless I buy a certificate from them or a third party like verisign. If I try to open my site using httpS://, a prompt pops up telling me the cert is not certified by anyone and do I want to accept it. I accept it and there is a locked key in the browser. Is the traffic encrypted (thus the tech is wrong)? It is interesting in that the hosting company's login has the SAME prompt when logging in. |
|
|||
|
NotGiven wrote: > I successfully installed openssl on hosted server. The host company says > that offers no security or encryption unless I buy a certificate from them > or a third party like verisign. > > If I try to open my site using httpS://, a prompt pops up telling me the > cert is not certified by anyone and do I want to accept it. This is standard (and "the" standard) behavior. Ie., do _you_ trust that this is a legit cert? > I accept it and there is a locked key in the browser. And the protocol in the browser's url is https -- note the added "s" (as in secure) -- so long as you're using ssl/https. > Is the traffic encrypted (thus the tech is wrong)? The tech is clueless :-) Try sniffing the traffic with ethereal. > It is interesting in that the hosting company's login has the SAME prompt > when logging in. Anyone can generate a certificate with whatever location, etc. info they please. The purpose of a "trusted" third party is to _verify_ that the certificate "owner" is who they say they are and that they are relatively trustworthy (ie., sufficient score on credit report and/or authorized to request certificate verification on behalf of the organization). For your own use (or a relatively small number of people) there is no reason to obtain some "seal of approval" from a third party. In fact, you might be surprised how many organiztions have not renewed their expired certs. hth, prg |
|
|||
|
"prg" <rdgentry1@cablelynx.com> wrote in message
news:1135032922.921937.36430@z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com... > > NotGiven wrote: >> I successfully installed openssl on hosted server. The host company says >> that offers no security or encryption unless I buy a certificate from >> them >> or a third party like verisign. >> >> If I try to open my site using httpS://, a prompt pops up telling me the >> cert is not certified by anyone and do I want to accept it. > > This is standard (and "the" standard) behavior. Ie., do _you_ trust > that this is a legit cert? > >> I accept it and there is a locked key in the browser. > > And the protocol in the browser's url is https -- note the added "s" > (as in secure) -- so long as you're using ssl/https. > >> Is the traffic encrypted (thus the tech is wrong)? > > The tech is clueless :-) Try sniffing the traffic with ethereal. > >> It is interesting in that the hosting company's login has the SAME prompt >> when logging in. > > Anyone can generate a certificate with whatever location, etc. info > they please. The purpose of a "trusted" third party is to _verify_ > that the certificate "owner" is who they say they are and that they are > relatively trustworthy (ie., sufficient score on credit report and/or > authorized to request certificate verification on behalf of the > organization). > > For your own use (or a relatively small number of people) there is no > reason to obtain some > "seal of approval" from a third party. In fact, you might be surprised > how many organiztions have not renewed their expired certs. > > hth, > prg Thanks! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|