nmap *.*.*.*
This is a discussion on nmap *.*.*.* within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Could I get in trouble for running this command on a computer connected to the WAN: nmap *.*.*.* -T Paranoid I ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
12-12-2005
|
|||
|
|||
nmap *.*.*.*
Could I get in trouble for running this command on a computer connected
to the WAN: nmap *.*.*.* -T Paranoid I want to do this entirely out of curiosity. I don't want to do anything illegal. I'd just like to see what kinds of servers are out there and what daemons they are running. Do I need to use Paranoid timing policy, or could I use Sneaky or Normal? Should I exclude class A IP addresses so that I won't be scanning so many government computers? I know, of course, that this program would take months or more to finish executing; I wouldn't be expecting it to actually scan every port on every IP address out there. TIA 
|
|
12-12-2005
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nmap *.*.*.*
"DJ Craig" <yomamaDJ1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134424790.364017.304790@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com > Could I get in trouble for running this command on a computer > connected to the WAN: > nmap *.*.*.* -T Paranoid Why don't you first consider what the wildcards will expand to on the command line?
|
|
12-13-2005
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nmap *.*.*.*
"DJ Craig" <yomamaDJ1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134429484.615251.87330@f14g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com > Thats true. But you know what I mean. Please read, understand and follow the items presented in http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ before posting to Usenet again.
|
|
12-13-2005
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nmap *.*.*.*
DJ Craig wrote:
> Could I get in trouble for running this command on a computer connected > to the WAN: > nmap *.*.*.* -T Paranoid > I want to do this entirely out of curiosity. I don't want to do > anything illegal. I'd just like to see what kinds of servers are out > there and what daemons they are running. Do I need to use Paranoid > timing policy, or could I use Sneaky or Normal? Should I exclude class > A IP addresses so that I won't be scanning so many government > computers? I know, of course, that this program would take months or > more to finish executing; I wouldn't be expecting it to actually scan > every port on every IP address out there. > > TIA > No - because the command will bomb out because you have not supplied a valid hostname or subnet, instead you have supplied the filenames in the current directory.
|
|
12-13-2005
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: nmap *.*.*.*
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:08:44 -0800, ynotssor wrote:
> Please read, understand and follow the items presented in > http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ before posting to Usenet again. Oh, please -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
Linear Mode
