This is a discussion on Nessus vs. Retina within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Pros and cons, Nessus and Retina? Thanks, Best, BB www.infosecon.org...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:46:50 +0200, BB wrote:
> Pros and cons, Nessus and Retina? > Thanks, > Best, > BB > www.infosecon.org Cons: There are 102 images loaded at this site: http://www.eeye.com/html/products/retina/ From that site: The vast majority of Retina's audits can be conducted without administrator rights, making Retina the easiest scanner to use, and the most cost-effective to deploy. Might be a good thing or not. For myself, I'm always wary of giving scanning rights. Call me paranoid; I've been called worse. Best. |
|
|||
|
"BB" <Bibi15fun@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:d2r5us$a2h$1@sunce.iskon.hr... > Pros and cons, Nessus and Retina? I don't trust code that isn't open source. Nessus is open source, Retina appears to be a proprietary executable, judging by the "free trial." |
|
|||
|
ynotssor wrote:
> > "BB" <Bibi15fun@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:d2r5us$a2h$1@sunce.iskon.hr... > >> Pros and cons, Nessus and Retina? > > I don't trust code that isn't open source. Nessus is open source, Retina > appears to be a proprietary executable, judging by the "free trial." I have heard many good things about Retina but have not used it myself. Seems, from reading posts on the closed InfoSec forums, most top guys use both! -- "Why do they call it rush hour when nothing moves?", Robin Williams |
|
|||
|
BB wrote:
> Pros and cons, Nessus and Retina? > Thanks, > Best, > BB > www.infosecon.org I don't know about proprietary stuff. It sound like retina is. I have been using Nessus for sometime and I have always been pleased with it.... Michael -- "Microsoft isn't evil, they just make really crappy operating systems." - Linus Torvald |
|
|||
|
"ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net> wrote in news:3be7psF6fgob5U1
@individual.net: > > "Darko Gavrilovic" <dgavrilovic@REMOVETHIShushmail.com> wrote in message > news:IEFwIp.EDu@campus-news-reading.utoronto.ca... > >> I have heard many good things about Retina but have not used it myself. > > What are those "good things"? > > ...."but some observers suggest that Retina may perform scanning better than its competitors".. http://infosecuritymag.techtarget.co...rtments_produc ts2.shtml dg |
|
|||
|
Darko Gavrilovic <dgavrilovicAThushmailDOTcom> wrote in
news:Xns962F43F375E32dgavrilovic2123@216.196.97.14 2: > "ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net> wrote in news:3be7psF6fgob5U1 > @individual.net: > >> >> "Darko Gavrilovic" <dgavrilovic@REMOVETHIShushmail.com> wrote in > message >> news:IEFwIp.EDu@campus-news-reading.utoronto.ca... >> >>> I have heard many good things about Retina but have not used it > myself. >> >> What are those "good things"? >> >> > > ..."but some observers suggest that Retina may perform scanning better > than its competitors".. > > http://infosecuritymag.techtarget.co...partments_prod uc > ts2.shtml > > dg http://tinyurl.com/67s7v |
|
|||
|
"ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net> wrote in news:3be7psF6fgob5U1
@individual.net: > > "Darko Gavrilovic" <dgavrilovic@REMOVETHIShushmail.com> wrote in message > news:IEFwIp.EDu@campus-news-reading.utoronto.ca... > >> I have heard many good things about Retina but have not used it myself. > > What are those "good things"? > Actually, while surfing i found a more useful article on the topic you might be interested if you havent read it yet. http://infosecuritymag.techtarget.co...ar/cover.shtml http://tinyurl.com/5w2kk Much regards, :-) dg |
|
|||
|
"Darko Gavrilovic" <dgavrilovicAThushmailDOTcom> wrote in message
news:Xns962F43F375E32dgavrilovic2123@216.196.97.14 2 >>> I have heard many good things about Retina but have not used it >>> myself. >> >> What are those "good things"? > > ..."but some observers suggest that Retina may perform scanning better > than its competitors".. That's what's called "sales speak." |