shadow file

Having nothing better to do that lurk in alt.hacking,
roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson) wrote :

>In article <v65rr0dkc9g0vpopi0u5ere0dq2h120ik5@4ax.com>,
>Lensman <op09_Black@bechtel.com> wrote:
>:Having nothing better to do that spam and xpost in alt.hacking,
>:roberson@ibd.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson) wrote :
>:[...]
>
>:What was wrong with leaving that in its original froups
>:(there were only two at that point), spamming twat.
>
>The headers of the message I replied to had:
>
> Newsgroups: alt.hacker,alt.hacking,be.comp.security,comp.os.li nux.security,comp.security.misc,comp.security.unix
> Subject: shadow file
> Followup-To: alt.hacker
>
>Did the copy of the OP you received have something different?

Yes.

Looking at it though, it appears my newsreader has chained you onto a
different message in the same thread. Under normal circumstances,
that would cause me to issue a sincere apology, but...

>
>Also, for my edification, could you point me to an RFC or
>well-known publication that I could employ to re-examine my message
>in order to determine the manner in which it was "spam" ?
>Did they perhaps redefine the BI calculation, or did they lower
>the BI limit so that EMP now includes BI's as low as
>squareroot(6) ?

.... you are such a tedious wannabe-patronising bastard that
I'm not going to bother.

Oh well.

HAND


--
/------------------------------------------------------------\
| Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. |
| Alan Turing |
\------------------------------------------------------------/