What's bad about this?

This is a discussion on What's bad about this? within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi: I have a trusted LAN with two Suse 9.1 Linux boxen each with the same two user accounts, ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > Linux Security

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-09-2004
Chris Carlen
 
Posts: n/a
Default What's bad about this?

Hi:

I have a trusted LAN with two Suse 9.1 Linux boxen each with the same
two user accounts, behind a firewall. The only flaw is a VMware running
Windows with IE sometimes, for a very limited number of web sites that
need it.

I have decided to first change the two users' default groups to be a
private group for that user, then change our umasks to 002.

The reason is so I can create a directory containing archived digital
photos belonging to a mutual group and with the gid bit set, that each
of us can write to without having to constantly fiddle with permissions.
The private default groups allow us to retain protection from one
another accidentally deleting one another's home files.

What might be bad about this plan?

Thanks.



--
_____________________
Christopher R. Carlen
crobc@earthlink.net
SuSE 9.1 Linux 2.6.5
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0