This is a discussion on Do you use HOSTS file ? within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; "Lars M. Hansen" wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:21:12 +0300, Thor Kottelin spoketh &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
"Lars M. Hansen" wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:21:12 +0300, Thor Kottelin spoketh > >"Lars M. Hansen" wrote: > >> By default, the hosts file are in the locations described. I figure if > >> someone have gone through the trouble of editing the registry to move > >> the file, then they would know where it was, and wouldn't need anyone > >> elses help in telling them where it can be found. > > > >I haven't edited the registry (in that respect), but my hosts file is still > >not in C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc. > Well, there are a number of reasons why that might be the case... Exactly. Therefore we should not overgeneralize. Thor -- http://www.anta.net/ |
|
|||
|
Thor Kottelin <thor@anta.net> wrote in message news:<4101429C.C3F47A91@anta.net>...
> Programmershouse wrote: > > > I wrote a page about Host File and how to use it. > > http://www.ifrance.com/programmershouse/HOSTS-EN.HTML > > What do you think about it and what else more could I add to it ? > > You cannot know the absolute location of the hosts file. For example, the > hosts file of the XP machine I'm writing this on is not located where you > state it is. Neither is my browser cache. You are writing in second person > when you mean first. Thor, I was talking about the usual location. Dont complicate things please. > > > Stickman answered me : "Unfortunately, using the hosts file to block > > unwanted content is terribly inefficient." > > Why is that ? > > Because it blocks nothing - it works by breaking name lookups. It isn't even > on topic for comp.security.firewalls. Follow-ups set. > > Thor Thor, I also asked questions about firewalls and proxies, if you read my message completely. What is your solution for blocking ads ? |
|
|||
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On torsdag 29. juli 2004, 17:54 Programmershouse tried to express an opinion: > What is your solution for blocking ads ? I use Privoxy on Linux. It's a proxy server like WebWasher, only with more features. www.privoxy.org <quote> "Privoxy is a web proxy with advanced filtering capabilities for protecting privacy, modifying web page content, managing cookies, controlling access, and removing ads, banners, pop-ups and other obnoxious Internet junk. Privoxy has a very flexible configuration and can be customized to suit individual needs and tastes. Privoxy has application for both stand-alone systems and multi-user networks." </quote> - -- Solbu - http://www.solbu.net Remove 'ugyldig' for email PGP key ID: 0xFA687324 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCcuxT1rWTfpocyQRAi8mAKCBy9v/X+QDIsPV0N4EpVEO21vj2ACeMaRk GykVnSPJLwhJ2jeJU11z3Rg= =4umE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|