This is a discussion on encrypted filesystem within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hi, as a newbie, I would like to know if there is any way to configure a server running linux ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi,
as a newbie, I would like to know if there is any way to configure a server running linux in which I can use strong-encryption (like PGP or something which is VERY hard to be violeted (like PGPdisk)) which can be auto-mounted at startup. I wish to be able to access the encrypted data ONLY with the password or by programs with the privileges to read those datas. (like the NTFS encryption, which I don't know how much secure is..) Final question: the speed of this system, would be ok or it would be compromised? Thanks! SiD` |
|
|||
|
Clinging to sanity, Brad Olin <bwo@bwo1.com> mumbled into her beard:
> On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:27:36 GMT, SiD` <miki28_@T_ngi.it> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>as a newbie, I would like to know if there is any way to configure a >>server running linux in which I can use strong-encryption (like PGP or >>something which is VERY hard to be violeted (like PGPdisk)) which can be >>auto-mounted at startup. I wish to be able to access the encrypted data >>ONLY with the password or by programs with the privileges to read those >>datas. (like the NTFS encryption, which I don't know how much secure is..) >> > > I have never done this myself, but I have read a few articles about it. > My suggestion is you do a bit of research yourself. As a linux user, > new or old, you will find this saves alot of your time and it usually > provides additional ideas that might be better than your original. > > Anyway, point your fav browser to... http://groups.google.com In the > search criteria box enter something like "linux encrypted disk" for this > question. There seems to be 100s of articles on this. > >>Final question: the speed of this system, would be ok or it would be >>compromised? > I'd not sure I understand the question here. My guess is that a > software encrypted disk would have significant overhead and might > need additional processor power. A hardware encrypted disk > controller would be a different story. AES, Blowfish, and Twofish were designed with a view to being efficient on general purpose systems, so the overhead should only be "moderate," as opposed to the "really painful" that is true for 3-DES. And note that if the disk controller does the work, that is likely to mean that the whole filesystem is held hostage to the disk controller. Change controllers and you probably lose all the data. That might not be what you want... -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ntlug.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; http://cbbrowne.com/info/linux.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #156. "If I have the hero and his party trapped, I will not wait until my Superweapon charges to finish them off if more conventional means are available." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/> |
|
|||
|
SiD` spilled the following:
> Hi, > > as a newbie, I would like to know if there is any way to configure a > server running linux in which I can use strong-encryption (like PGP or > something which is VERY hard to be violeted (like PGPdisk)) which can be > auto-mounted at startup. I wish to be able to access the encrypted data > ONLY with the password or by programs with the privileges to read those > datas. (like the NTFS encryption, which I don't know how much secure is..) > > Final question: the speed of this system, would be ok or it would be > compromised? > AIR encrypted loopback filesystems require a pass-phrase in order to mount (i.e. it is unlocked when you mount it - not something you would want to happen un-attended). Inidividual files can be encrypted using pgp or ssl, and the unix filesystem and security model can be applied to most cases without resorting to ACLs (I HATE ACLS!). If allowing un-attended reboots is a must then I suspect this maybe more apposite to your application than an entire encrypted filesystem. Regarding speed - an encrypted filesystem will be slower if you do it in software - whether the effect will be significant / noticable....we'd need to know a lot more about the application / hardware / i/o traffic to hazard a guess. What NTFS encryption? C. |
|
|||
|
> Clinging to sanity, Brad Olin <bwo@bwo1.com> mumbled into her beard:
>>>as a newbie, I would like to know if there is any way to configure a >>>server running linux in which I can use strong-encryption (like PGP or >>>something which is VERY hard to be violeted (like PGPdisk)) which can be >>>auto-mounted at startup. I wish to be able to access the encrypted data >>>ONLY with the password or by programs with the privileges to read those >>>datas. (like the NTFS encryption, which I don't know how much secure is..) >> I have never done this myself, but I have read a few articles about it. >> My suggestion is you do a bit of research yourself. Take a look at emacs + crypt++ . This is very convenient for small files. Consider using a non-structured filesystem (e.g. ext2) on a floppy disk with a single file (e.g. image.loop.gpg) on it. Decrypt the file before mounting with the loop device and after umounting, encrypt the file and shred(1) the clear version. >>>Final question: the speed of this system, would be ok or it would be >>>compromised? Speed will be impacted, but gpg and other such software tools are designed to be fast enough that the slowdown should be less than 50% and usually less than 5%. Hopefully helpful, -- Dr. Robert J. Meier Server Vantage Agent Infrastructure |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:27:36 GMT, SiD` <miki28_@T_ngi.it> wrote:
>Hi, > >as a newbie, I would like to know if there is any way to configure a >server running linux in which I can use strong-encryption (like PGP or >something which is VERY hard to be violeted (like PGPdisk)) which can be >auto-mounted at startup. I wish to be able to access the encrypted data >ONLY with the password or by programs with the privileges to read those >datas. (like the NTFS encryption, which I don't know how much secure is..) > >Final question: the speed of this system, would be ok or it would be >compromised? > > >Thanks! > >SiD` I am also a Linux newbie also (I got stuck in a bash prompt last night and couldn't work out how to get back to the gui) . So forgive me if I am off course here. Knoppix mib is a cd bootable version of Knoppix that supports encrypted partitions or containers. It uses AES. It may or may not be exactly what you want but for a newbie it offers encryption without having to install anything. It runs from a cd and wont touch your hard drive unless you tell it to. Your encrypted container could be a usb device. Otherwise I think you have to add the encryption functionality to your own distribution. Something that is beyond my Linux capabilities at the moment. http://www.bouissou.net/knoppix-mib/...oppix-Mib.html I do find however that half the menus are in French even after starting with lang=en, but coming from someone who gets stuck in bash prompts it is too early to blame the cd. Andrew |