This is a discussion on Re: FreeSSL experience within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Colin McKinnon <colin.thisisnotmysurname@ntlworld.deletemeunlessU RaBot.com> wrote in message news:<gaJ7c.165$7%.17@newsfe1-...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Colin McKinnon <colin.thisisnotmysurname@ntlworld.deletemeunlessU RaBot.com> wrote in message news:<gaJ7c.165$7%.17@newsfe1-win>...
> Kyler Laird spilled the following: > > > I needed a cheap SSL certificate quickly last weekend. I'd been > > meaning to try FreeSSL > > http://freessl.com/ > > for awhile, so I decided to give it a whirl. > > > > Sounded interesting, but unless they can get their CA cert into browsers it > doesn't seem to offer any advantage over using your own CA. > > It certainly isn't listed in any of the bowsers I use, and I don't recall > seeing it in the standard bundle from Microsoft. For what it is worth, they are using the UTN: the UserTrust Network. It is there in Mozilla. Edwin |
|
|||
|
Colin McKinnon <colin.thisisnotmysurname@ntlworld.deletemeunlessU RaBot.com> wrote in message news:<lLhfc.368$74.296@newsfe1-win>...
> Edwin Groothuis spilled the following: > > > > > For what it is worth, they are using the UTN: the UserTrust Network. > > It is there in Mozilla. > > > > Ahh. Ta, > > C. freessl.com and sslreview.com are owned by the same person. Do a whois on both sites. They are owned by Christopher Bailey. Judging from his email, and doing a search on the directory at emory.edu, I believe he is a student there. |