This is a discussion on Broken threads within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; What the **** is up with all the busted threads in this newsgroup lately? Is my newsreader on the fritz, or ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Matt Gauthier <elleron@yahoo.com> writes:
> What the **** is up with all the busted threads in this newsgroup lately? > Is my newsreader on the fritz, or are people just posting at random? 11 out of the last 250 articles appear to have been threaded by subject + date alone, here, rather than by references header. Hmmm. If you're seeing more than that, not me, occifer :8) ~Tim -- The phrase 'object-oriented' means |piglet@stirfried.vegetable.org.uk a lot of things. Half are obvious, and |http://spodzone.org.uk/cesspit/ the other half are mistakes. (Paul Graham) | |
|
|||
|
"Matt Gauthier" <elleron@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.01.25.09.23.42.409593@yahoo.com > What the **** is up with all the busted threads in this newsgroup > lately? Is my newsreader on the fritz, or are people just posting at > random? Maybe if you gave a specific example of what you're referring to, people could understand your point. Usenet can sometimes appear "busted" to those who don't understand how it works. It can occasionally take a longer time for an original post to appear on ones news server that the responses to it from others. tony -- use hotmail for any email replies -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:35:41 +0000, Tim Haynes wrote:
> Matt Gauthier <elleron@yahoo.com> writes: > >> What the **** is up with all the busted threads in this newsgroup lately? >> Is my newsreader on the fritz, or are people just posting at random? > > 11 out of the last 250 articles appear to have been threaded by subject + > date alone, here, rather than by references header. Hmmm. If you're seeing > more than that, not me, occifer :8) > > ~Tim Thanks, Tim. It was my newsreader on the fritz, some corruption in the cache I suppose. Stupid thing. Serves me right for abandoning tin. -- Matt Gauthier <elleron @ attbi.com> |