This is a discussion on Re: Linux and spyware? within the Linux Security forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; "Sebastian Hans" <hanss@in.tum.de> wrote in message news:bdrmeq$4bo2$3@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
"Sebastian Hans" <hanss@in.tum.de> wrote in message news:bdrmeq$4bo2$3@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de... > Kenneth A Kauffman <kkauffman@nospam.headfog.com> wrote: > > > > Devils advocate... > > > > Why would you care about blocking web bugs? Its not doing anything to your > > local machine or causing extra pop ups. Its mostly to target demographic > > information regarding browsing habits. > > > > Let the flames begin... > > Because where I go in the web is none of doubleclick.net's business. > It's that simple. > > What would you say if at every street corner there stood a person whose > job it was to tag people and note where they were going? Would this > disturb you? Would you care if they told you it was *mostly* to gather > data for traffic statistics? > > Seb. Somewhat good argument. However, they DO monitor cars in "similar" fashion. Not by tagging them individually, but by monitoring volume in certain areas. You know those "rubber hoses" that show up across roads every once in awhile... A person DOES have the right to watch you from a distance to see if you cross a particular intersection in a public area, but not to follow you continuously. A web bug really only "checks you out" when you hit a specific "intersection", not through the life of your browsing experience. ken k |
|
|||
|
Kenneth A Kauffman <kkauffman@nospam.headfog.com> wrote:
> "Sebastian Hans" <hanss@in.tum.de> wrote in message > news:bdrmeq$4bo2$3@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de... >> Kenneth A Kauffman <kkauffman@nospam.headfog.com> wrote: [why care about web bugs?] >> >> What would you say if at every street corner there stood a person whose >> job it was to tag people and note where they were going? Would this >> disturb you? Would you care if they told you it was *mostly* to gather >> data for traffic statistics? > > Somewhat good argument. However, they DO monitor cars in "similar" fashion. > Not by tagging them individually, but by monitoring volume in certain areas. > You know those "rubber hoses" that show up across roads every once in > awhile... Yes, but they don't try to track me, personally. > A person DOES have the right to watch you from a distance to see if you > cross a particular intersection in a public area, but not to follow you > continuously. A web bug really only "checks you out" when you hit a > specific "intersection", not through the life of your browsing experience. But they try. Anyway, just because it's legal, I don't have to like it. Ciao. Seb. |