This is a discussion on flow comparison USB vs PCMCIA within the Linux Networking forums, part of the Linux Forums category; I was wondering if anyone could explain the following observation? I am comparing the data flow to the very same ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I was wondering if anyone could explain the following observation?
I am comparing the data flow to the very same laptop having two interfaces alternately configured. asix chipset 10/100 USB 700KB/s (+-15) 3com 3C574 16bit 10/100 PCMCIA 880KB/s (smaller fluctuation) So not really as bad as I thought but a very discernable difference. It would appear you pay a high price for USB unless the implimentation is poor? This is a gentoo system 2.6.18 kernel. The rate info was derived by copying the same dvd image from the same server in the same room as laptop. Each interface was using the same port in the switch. (ie I moved the wire) Could this be attributed to the magic or manipulation in the usb bridging? The asix chipset is in a targus USB dock. http://www.targus.com/us/product_det...sp?sku=ACP45US Or could this be the low horsepower of the laptop a 380XD thinkpad at 233mhz? Perhaps the usb is dependant more on horsepower than pcmcia due to the externalization of the bus. Thanks for any info. -Walt -- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|