This is a discussion on Information on Software load balancing methods required!- within the Linux Networking forums, part of the Linux Forums category; As I am aware, there are both Hardware and Software Load balancing methods/servers available in the Market. I favour ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
As I am aware, there are both Hardware and Software Load balancing
methods/servers available in the Market. I favour for the Software load balancing method(eventhough it needs to be run on a separate Hardware), as it will be cheaper compared to the dedicated Hardware load balancer. I would like to get your suggestions also on the same. Could you also provide information on some of the popularly known/used software load balancing methods in the Market(not very simple ones like DNS method where server unavailability is not detected)? |
|
|||
|
qazmlp1209@rediffmail.com wrote:
> As I am aware, there are both Hardware and Software Load balancing > methods/servers available in the Market. > I favour for the Software load balancing method(eventhough it needs to > be run on a separate Hardware), as it will be cheaper compared to the > dedicated Hardware load balancer. I would like to get your suggestions > also on the same. Could you also provide information on some of the > popularly known/used software load balancing methods in the Market(not > very simple ones like DNS method where server unavailability is not > detected)? What type of loadbalancing are you talking about ? Network layer, physical layer, application layer - what ? For each application of loadbalancing, there will be numerous solutions. Just FYI, apart from the very simplest types (on the network layer) all loadbalancing is done in software; something needs to make semi-intelligent decisions about what, when and why to loadbalance. That something will be a program. J. |