redundant linux firewall

This is a discussion on redundant linux firewall within the Linux Networking forums, part of the Linux Forums category; We have designed a custom ip-tables based linux firewall. This firewall guards 3 web servers and a mail server. ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Linux Forums > Linux Networking

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-2004
Aditya Ivaturi
 
Posts: n/a
Default redundant linux firewall

We have designed a custom ip-tables based linux firewall. This firewall
guards 3 web servers and a mail server. Recently it died on us due to a
faulty RAM module (in the hindsight we should have tested it). This prompted
us to look for a failover firewall which will eventually lead to a higly
available setup. This failover machine need not be identical in
configuration but the sessions and iptables etc need to be synced. I did
some research in to tools that'll help me do this and I came across a few
projects which address this in one way or the other. Linux-ha
(http://linux-ha.org/), Fake (http://www.vergenet.net/linux/fake/) and
UltraMonkey (http://www.ultramonkey.org/).

Any suggestions on which one might be a better solution for our situation or
are there any other projects which are better? Any light on some pros and
cons (from real world experience and not what is written on the web page)
would be great. Thanks.

--Turi


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2004
Menno Duursma
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: redundant linux firewall

On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:56:39 -0500, Aditya Ivaturi wrote:

> [ ... ] sessions and iptables etc need to be synced.


http://cvs.netfilter.org/netfilter-ha/

[ Snip: Linux-HA ]

Look for "The failover of the load balancer" here:
http://www.linux-vs.org/HighAvailability.html

You need an aditional connection between the firewalls,
(for the "heartbeat"). In this kind of a setup though.

> Any suggestions on which one might be a better solution for our
> situation or are there any other projects which are better?


http://www.ucarp.org/

> Any light on some pros and cons (from real world experience and not what
> is written on the web page) would be great. Thanks.


Well, i guess this followup isn't great then ...

Why one would want to use: CARP rather then VRRP / HSRP :
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html

--
-Menno.

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0