internet access through another subnet

I have to two subnets, two PC's:
192.168.0.1 <-> ISDN/modem <-> 192.168.10.1
(ppp gets 192.168.10.20)
I
I
router-PC
192.168.0.99
DSL -> internet

The client 10.1 should have full access
to internet. I've already reached my target
by giving a 0.X-adress to the 10.1-machine.
But not with different subnets. (BTW: I search
a solution that can be expanded to two subnets:
0.X and 10.X. But step by step ....)
192.168.0.1 is calling 10.1 an gets: 192.168.10.20

Thats what I tried to realize surfing from 10.1:

10.1: route add default gw 192.168.0.1 ippp1
entry in /etc/resolve.conf
0.1: arp -Ds 192.168.10.20 eth0 netmask 255.255.255.255 pub
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

.... but it doesn't work with different networks.
What is my fault?

tia
Ekkard

Ekkard Gerlach wrote:

> I have to two subnets, two PC's:
> 192.168.0.1 <-> ISDN/modem <-> 192.168.10.1
> (ppp gets 192.168.10.20)
> I
> I
> router-PC
> 192.168.0.99
> DSL -> internet
>
> The client 10.1 should have full access
> to internet. I've already reached my target
> by giving a 0.X-adress to the 10.1-machine.
> But not with different subnets. (BTW: I search
> a solution that can be expanded to two subnets:
> 0.X and 10.X. But step by step ....)
> 192.168.0.1 is calling 10.1 an gets: 192.168.10.20
>
> Thats what I tried to realize surfing from 10.1:
>
> 10.1: route add default gw 192.168.0.1 ippp1
> entry in /etc/resolve.conf
> 0.1: arp -Ds 192.168.10.20 eth0 netmask 255.255.255.255 pub
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> ... but it doesn't work with different networks.
> What is my fault?

Did you add a route to 192.168.10.1 on router-PC?

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 01:02:25 +0000, Snowbat <snowbat@geocities.com> wrote:
> Ekkard Gerlach wrote:
>
>> I have to two subnets, two PC's:
>> 192.168.0.1 <-> ISDN/modem <-> 192.168.10.1
>> (ppp gets 192.168.10.20)
>> I
>> I
>> router-PC
>> 192.168.0.99
>> DSL -> internet
>>
>> The client 10.1 should have full access
>> to internet. I've already reached my target
>> by giving a 0.X-adress to the 10.1-machine.
>> But not with different subnets. (BTW: I search
>> a solution that can be expanded to two subnets:
>> 0.X and 10.X. But step by step ....)
>> 192.168.0.1 is calling 10.1 an gets: 192.168.10.20
>>
>> Thats what I tried to realize surfing from 10.1:
>>
>> 10.1: route add default gw 192.168.0.1 ippp1
>> entry in /etc/resolve.conf
>> 0.1: arp -Ds 192.168.10.20 eth0 netmask 255.255.255.255 pub
>> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>
>> ... but it doesn't work with different networks.
>> What is my fault?
>
> Did you add a route to 192.168.10.1 on router-PC?

Ie, route add -net 192.168.10.0 gw 192.168.0.1 dev (whatever-eth)

And does router-PC know to masquerade 192.168.10.0/24 network (or entire
192.168.0.0/16 block)?

And make sure that 192.168.0.1 box does NOT set a default route to its
ippp, since that should still point to router-PC.

--
David Efflandt - All spam ignored http://www.de-srv.com/

David Efflandt wrote:
>>
>> Did you add a route to 192.168.10.1 on router-PC?
>
> Ie, route add -net 192.168.10.0 gw 192.168.0.1 dev (whatever-eth)
>
> And does router-PC know to masquerade 192.168.10.0/24 network (or entire
> 192.168.0.0/16 block)?
>
> And make sure that 192.168.0.1 box does NOT set a default route to its
> ippp, since that should still point to router-PC.
>
thank you, your pointer were right. The IP-traffic reaches the
router PC and it going into internet. But nothing comes back.
First there was no routing to 10.x. I put the routing but nothing
more happens. I think I have to tell my SuseFirewall (Suse 8.2)
that there is a second network. I don't understand much of routing
firewall and masquerading. So, the next days I will read tutorials.
Before any other discussion here is not worth it.

thx
Ekkard