rdate question

This is a discussion on rdate question within the Linux Networking forums, part of the Linux Forums category; On 2004-02-06, KR <kristian.rasmussen@broadpark.no.spam.com> wrote: > Probably because the server doesn'...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Linux Forums > Linux Networking

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2004
John Thompson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: rdate question

On 2004-02-06, KR <kristian.rasmussen@broadpark.no.spam.com> wrote:

> Probably because the server doesn't support rdate. Forget rdate, it's
> obsolete and AFAIK doesn't even support updates against a server in a
> different time zone.


Just make sure you're using the proper TZ enviroment and rdate works fine
from any server.

--

-John (JohnThompson@new.rr.com)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2004
chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: rdate question

Jørn Dahl-Stamnes <jorn.dahl-stamnes@nospam.edb.com> wrote:
> The reason for using rdate, is that I connect to the machines through an ISDN
> line. It do not want have the line up all the time, which I probably will if I
> use NTP.


Use ntpdate when you bring the line up. Or chrony (which apparently
works well over dial-up lines).

> However, rdate does not work as expected:


Don't use it, then!

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2004
Skylar Thompson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: rdate question

On 6 Feb 2004 05:10:57 GMT, Jem Berkes <jb@users.pc9.org> wrote:
>> If I do a 'rdate -p some.host'
>>
>> Do some.host need to have some deamon running in order to reply, or
>> what?

>
> Yes, definitely. rdate sends a UDP or TCP query as per RFC 868.
>
> People seem to like NTP these days, but I'm still a fan of rdate (not as
> accurate, but much simpler and does the job). This reminds me, which rdate
> client are you using? I've found a possibly ancient version, created by Lee
> Moore and most recently modifed in '99 by Arkadiusz Miskiewicz. I'd like to
> grab a newer version if one exists :)


NTP has many advantages, such as comparing against multiple servers, strata
definitions, and an alogrithm to predict the drift of the hardware clock.

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu)
-- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2004
Karthik
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: rdate question

Jørn Dahl-Stamnes wrote:
> If I do a 'rdate -p some.host'
>
> Do some.host need to have some deamon running in order to reply, or what?
>
> I have tried to use the rdate against an internal linux server, but it won't
> reply. If I try a 'rdate -p 127.0.0.1' on that server, nothing happens.
>
> Jørn Dahl-Stamnes, EDB Teamco AS
> e-mail: Jorn.Dahl-Stamnes@nospam.novit.no (remove nospam first)
> web: http://spiderman.novit.no/dahls/


The machine should be running Internet Time service i guess to respond
to your rdate query.

Isn't rdate supposed to broadcast to the entire network rather than to
some host specifically ..!! i have'nt used it in a long time ..

You should probably consider using ntpdate and setting up your own NTP
server. It is much simpler and easier to maintain.

Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0