This is a discussion on Linux server within the Linux Networking forums, part of the Linux Forums category; I'm looking for a server Linux that can replace SME Linux (which seems to be a pretty broken version ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I'm looking for a server Linux that can replace SME Linux (which seems to be a pretty broken version of Linux). What I need is a server Linux that can handle: 1. Multiple disk drives set up as soft-raid pairs. 2. Multiple LAN cards - no point in having a hub if I have a server! 3. A modem with several alternate dial-up numbers. 4. Printers Essentially I want to connect 2 PCs and a laptop to the server directly, use the server to handle my data storage and my printing and to use it also as an Internet gateway. A built-in firewall would be advantageous. Any suggestions? SME can't handle multiple numbers or multiple LAN cards and I've never managed to get it to work with the printer either. -- Yours Widow Twankey Now 10% Twankier than ever |
|
|||
|
Widow Twankey wrote:
> > I'm looking for a server Linux that can replace SME Linux (which seems to > be a pretty broken version of Linux). > > What I need is a server Linux that can handle: > 1. Multiple disk drives set up as soft-raid pairs. Any modern distro > 2. Multiple LAN cards - no point in having a hub if I have a server! Any modern distro > 3. A modem with several alternate dial-up numbers. Any modern distro > 4. Printers Any modern distro > > Essentially I want to connect 2 PCs and a laptop to the server directly, > use the server to handle my data storage and my printing and to use it > also as an Internet gateway. A built-in firewall would be advantageous. > > Any suggestions? SME can't handle multiple numbers or multiple LAN cards > and I've never managed to get it to work with the printer either. > I would recommend SuSE 9.0 professional if you are looking for GUI configuration tools, or Slackware 9.1 if you are comfortable with the CLI and editing config files. For printing, I would advise using cups. Fred |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:59:58 -0000, Widow Twankey wrote:
> Mandrake 9.1 any good? It was good for me, but how would we know if it would be good for you. Please read http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html if you have a machine with less than 128 meg ram or slow processor it will not be good for you. |
|
|||
|
Widow Twankey <abuse@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> I'm looking for a server Linux that can replace SME Linux (which seems to be > a pretty broken version of Linux). > What I need is a server Linux that can handle: > 1. Multiple disk drives set up as soft-raid pairs. > 2. Multiple LAN cards - no point in having a hub if I have a server! Only an idiot would use such a setup when you can easily get one/two use-able switches for the price of a single decent NIC. > 3. A modem with several alternate dial-up numbers. > 4. Printers > Essentially I want to connect 2 PCs and a laptop to the server directly, use > the server to handle my data storage and my printing and to use it also as > an Internet gateway. A built-in firewall would be advantageous. > Any suggestions? SME can't handle multiple numbers or multiple LAN cards and > I've never managed to get it to work with the printer either. If you like GUI tools, take a look at SuSE 9.0. -- Michael Heiming Remove +SIGNS and www. if you expect an answer, sorry for inconvenience, but I get tons of SPAM |