This is a discussion on dhcpd + no subnet declaration within the Linux Networking forums, part of the Linux Forums category; I have a linux 9.0 box with dhcp running. My linux box has an IP address of 192.168....
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I have a linux 9.0 box with dhcp running. My linux box has an IP
address of 192.168.4.132 (eth0). What I want to do is offer 65.192.106.0/24 to my customers. I started off with only one subnet declaration for the 106 network, but the server complained about not having a subnet dec. for the 4.132 network. So I put in the following: subnet 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { } I don't want any IP's issued out of this network. I want 100% of the IPs to be the 65.192.106.0/24. But in /var/log/messages I get an error: dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:46:40:9c:68 via eth0: network 192.168.4.0/24: no free leases. But that's just it, I don't want any of my customers to get 192.168.4.0 IPs just 65.192.106.0/24. server ip - 192.168.4.132 (public IP = 65.192.104.16) server pool - 65.192.106.2 - 65.192.106.250 dhcpd.conf option domain-name-servers 65.192.104.2 65.192.104.3; option domain-name "sctelcom.net"; option broadcast-address 65.192.106.255; option routers 65.192.106.1 ddns-update-style ad-hoc #osi_main subnet 65.192.106.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 65.192.106.2 - 65.192.106.250 } subnet 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { } Is this possible? |
|
|||
|
Zack Odell <zodell@sctelcom.com> randomly warbled in
comp.os.linux.networking: > I have a linux 9.0 box with dhcp running. No, you don't - really. <snip commercialism> Yesss... <snip> > option domain-name "sctelcom.net"; Hmmm...wireless, eh ? you *might* have mentioned this... <more snip> > range 65.192.106.2 - 65.192.106.250 Lose the dash - it will not work. man dhcpd.conf and read the **** log files! -- Jeroen Geilman All your bits are belong to us. |