This is a discussion on What its meaning? within the Linux General forums, part of the Linux Forums category; Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? Example: ping/? ping 127.0.0.1 ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote:
> Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? > Example: > ping/? > ping 127.0.0.1 > ping<local coputer in the Net> > ping<network> > ping<ip> Packet InterNet Groper http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...&q=define:Ping Or your shorter link: http://tinyurl.com/s8lnk -- Gordon Burgess-Parker Interim Systems and Management Accounting www.gbpcomputing.co.uk |
|
|||
|
PING stands for Packet INternet Groper. It transmits data packets to
the destination to verify whether communication link is ok. Gordon wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote: > > > Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? > > Example: > > ping/? > > ping 127.0.0.1 > > ping<local coputer in the Net> > > ping<network> > > ping<ip> > > Packet InterNet Groper > > http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...&q=define:Ping > > Or your shorter link: > http://tinyurl.com/s8lnk > > -- > Gordon Burgess-Parker > Interim Systems and Management Accounting > www.gbpcomputing.co.uk |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:44:02 -0800, sachin.ghumre wrote:
> PING stands for Packet INternet Groper. It transmits data packets to > the destination to verify whether communication link is ok. > > Gordon wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote: >> >> > Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? >> > Example: >> > ping/? >> > ping 127.0.0.1 >> > ping<local coputer in the Net> >> > ping<network> >> > ping<ip> >> >> Packet InterNet Groper >> >> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...&q=define:Ping >> >> Or your shorter link: >> http://tinyurl.com/s8lnk >> Why are you telling ME this? -- Gordon Burgess-Parker Interim Systems and Management Accounting www.gbpcomputing.co.uk |
|
|||
|
Gordon wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote: > >> Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? >> Example: >> ping/? >> ping 127.0.0.1 >> ping<local coputer in the Net> >> ping<network> >> ping<ip> > > Packet InterNet Groper This is bogus: http://ftp.arl.mil/~mike/ping.html -- Paul |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:26:54 +0000, Paul Black wrote:
> Gordon wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote: >> >>> Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? >>> Example: >>> ping/? >>> ping 127.0.0.1 >>> ping<local coputer in the Net> >>> ping<network> >>> ping<ip> >> >> Packet InterNet Groper > > This is bogus: > http://ftp.arl.mil/~mike/ping.html Quote from the page: From my point of view PING is not an acronym standing for Packet InterNet Grouper, it's a sonar analogy. However, I've heard second-hand that Dave Mills offered this expansion of the name, so perhaps we're both right. -- Gordon Burgess-Parker Interim Systems and Management Accounting www.gbpcomputing.co.uk |
|
|||
|
Paul Black wrote:
> Gordon wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote: >> >>> Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? >>> Example: >>> ping/? >>> ping 127.0.0.1 >>> ping<local coputer in the Net> >>> ping<network> >>> ping<ip> >> Packet InterNet Groper > > This is bogus: > http://ftp.arl.mil/~mike/ping.html > Excellent link. |
|
|||
|
Gordon wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:44:02 -0800, sachin.ghumre wrote: > >> PING stands for Packet INternet Groper. It transmits data packets to >> the destination to verify whether communication link is ok. >> >> Gordon wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:22:04 -0800, Better wrote: >>> >>> > Who can tell me the meaning of "PING" in IT area? >>> > Example: >>> > ping/? >>> > ping 127.0.0.1 >>> > ping<local coputer in the Net> >>> > ping<network> >>> > ping<ip> >>> >>> Packet InterNet Groper >>> >>> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...&q=define:Ping >>> >>> Or your shorter link: >>> http://tinyurl.com/s8lnk > > Why are you telling ME this? He isn't. He is telling the world. Better you complain about the top-posting. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/> |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:39:10 -0500, CBFalconer wrote:
> > He isn't. He is telling the world. Better you complain about the > top-posting. he was. he replied to my post. Google groups - say no more. -- Gordon Burgess-Parker Interim Systems and Management Accounting www.gbpcomputing.co.uk |