Re: i have a problem, any ideas !?

In article <pan.2003.07.30.09.58.07.100630@12mm.de>, a.immler@12mm.de
says...
> hello,
>
>
> i have to setup a small network of 4 servers. 2 of them are webserver and
> the other 2 are fileserver. the 2 webservers are in hot-standby so only
> one works at the same time. the 2 fileservers need to have the same
> content all the time (can be any partition) and the content is mounted at
> the webservers.

ObMoan: WHY ??

Why mount webserver content on a system other than the webserver itself?

But we'll move along, since if you want to do that, of course you can...

> first i thought of the "coda" filesystem but notices that this won't work
> because of the tokens, authentication etc.

ObAgain: WHY ??

Why would you think that coda does not work because of "authentication,
tokens, etc" (whatever that means)?

Are you suggesting that reading your company mail on a web-based
interface will also inevitably FAIL because of "authentication, tokens,
etc", again, whatever that means?

You are stating no more and no less than that using a very secure
network FS will not work because it is based on strong authentication
and encryption. How bizarre...

> do you have any idea what FS i could use in a productional environment ?

As soon as you explain what a "productional" environment is, probably.

--
Jeroen

Still can't figure out Gravity 2.5