For Non-Muslims

On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:47:55 -0400, T wrote:

> But then that's how most religions work. Judaism didn't propagate well,
> but then came Christianity and now Islam which perfected the level of
> violence and hatred of the other.

Of course, because of your embedded denial, you refuse to see that all of
this "violence" is the response to the hundreds of years that the Xtians
have been terrorizing them with the crusades and the Bush/Bush/Cheney
invasion and such.

Thanks,
Rich

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT), Danny <dindyk@energy.com.au>
wrote:

>Get off of this NG. This is not the place for this discussion. I would
>ask you to post in the appropriate NG. As I would all the other non-
>appropriate posters. Like selling chinese components etc etc

---
Daniel:

Let me show you the ropes.

I don't know from where you think your authority stems, but you're
posting to USENET, where the only authority you have is the wit you
can use to exert pressure on your readers in order to convince them
that you're right and that they're wrong if they're not in agreement
with your edicts.

Google groups (where you're posting from) is a seriously flawed
SPAM-enhancing web-based interface which allows you noobs to read and,
unfortunately, to post to USENET without an understanding of how
USENET works, a real newsreader, or an account with a real USENET
service provider.

Had you decided to do the right thing and lurk for a while, in order
to learn the culture of sci.electronics.design, where I'm posting
from, you might have learned that nothing is off topic here except for
SPAM.

When there's idle time available we'll often trade recipes, beat each
other up about our political affiliations, share photographs, and
relate anecdotes which have nothing to do with electronic design.

And more.

If you find that objectionable then I suggest you follow your own
advice and "Get off of this NG."


JF

MooseFET wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2:33 am, Ù?سÙ?Ø© اÙSÙ?اÙ? <olaal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 31 ��, 07:36, "Peacenik" <cnelsonpub...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "???? ?????" <olaal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > >news:fb403ef4-cc65-4cd5-964e-5397aa40414c@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> > > Allah (God)
> >
> > > Islam is the complete submission and obedience to Allah (God). The
> > > name Allah (God) in Islam never refers to Muhammad (pbuh), as many
> > > Christians may think; Allah is the personal name of God.
> >
> > > ==
> >
> > > I don't believe in Allah. Or any god. Go away.
> >
> > Thank you for clarifying this idea missing from many Christians
>
> He isn't a Christian. A christian does believe in a god. So do many
> others. None can agree about the exact nature of God. They will all
> tell you that the others have got it wrong. Lots have a book written
> in the distant past and somehow believe that its age makes it more
> accurate. They know that the others also have books written in the
> distant past. They believe that the age of those books prove that
> they are inaccurate.

Actually, its turtles all the way down.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
The world is coming to an end. Please log off.

On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:50:25 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:46:40 -0700 (PDT), Danny <dindyk@energy.com.au>
>wrote:
>
>>Get off of this NG. This is not the place for this discussion. I would
>>ask you to post in the appropriate NG. As I would all the other non-
>>appropriate posters. Like selling chinese components etc etc
>
>---
>Daniel:
>
>Let me show you the ropes.
>
>I don't know from where you think your authority stems, but you're
>posting to USENET, where the only authority you have is the wit you
>can use to exert pressure on your readers in order to convince them
>that you're right and that they're wrong if they're not in agreement
>with your edicts.
>
>Google groups (where you're posting from) is a seriously flawed
>SPAM-enhancing web-based interface which allows you noobs to read and,
>unfortunately, to post to USENET without an understanding of how
>USENET works, a real newsreader, or an account with a real USENET
>service provider.
>
>Had you decided to do the right thing and lurk for a while, in order
>to learn the culture of sci.electronics.design, where I'm posting
>from, you might have learned that nothing is off topic here except for
>SPAM.
>
>When there's idle time available we'll often trade recipes, beat each
>other up about our political affiliations, share photographs, and
>relate anecdotes which have nothing to do with electronic design.
>
>And more.
>
>If you find that objectionable then I suggest you follow your own
>advice and "Get off of this NG."
>
>
>JF


Hear hear!

Gunner, posting from rec.crafts.metalworking

On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:22:26 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
<eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:

>
>Of course, because of your embedded denial, you refuse to see that all of
>this "violence" is the response to the hundreds of years that the Xtians
>have been terrorizing them with the crusades and the Bush/Bush/Cheney
>invasion and such.
>
>Thanks,
>Rich


Bush has only been in office 7 yrs, not hundreds

Gunner

"Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie" <eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> skrev i en
meddelelse news:pan.2008.04.03.00.21.55.481022@doubleclick.ne t...
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:47:55 -0400, T wrote:
>
>> But then that's how most religions work. Judaism didn't propagate well,
>> but then came Christianity and now Islam which perfected the level of
>> violence and hatred of the other.
>
> Of course, because of your embedded denial, you refuse to see that all of
> this "violence" is the response to the hundreds of years that the Xtians
> have been terrorizing them with the crusades and the Bush/Bush/Cheney
> invasion and such.

Ah, so it is our fault that muslims are killing other muslims at about at
rate of about 300:1; that is for every single muslim killed by "the West",
muslim-on-muslim violence kills 300. That makes me feel so much better
already.

Not that I care of course; In particular I do not think "the West" should
even *be* in muslim countries. Let them sort themselves and their own mess
out. They are clearly at least 300 times better at it than we are!

>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>

PS
Go read a book! The crusades was the natural response to repeated islamic
conquest against western territories (and at the same time, the west got rid
of the most ignorant, violent and fanatic part of the population as well as
a good deal of the most feared nobility thereby giving civilisation a chance
to rise). *That's* how it's done. The US "Peacekeeping" in the middle east
is the opposite process, breeding stupidity and fanatism by keeping them off
each others throats so evolution never takes place (and making us stupid as
well because we have to "think" (i.e. *not* think, instead relying on force,
threats, fantasy and dogma) like the opponent).

In article <pan.2008.04.03.00.21.55.481022@doubleclick.net> ,
eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net says...
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:47:55 -0400, T wrote:
>
> > But then that's how most religions work. Judaism didn't propagate well,
> > but then came Christianity and now Islam which perfected the level of
> > violence and hatred of the other.
>
> Of course, because of your embedded denial, you refuse to see that all of
> this "violence" is the response to the hundreds of years that the Xtians
> have been terrorizing them with the crusades and the Bush/Bush/Cheney
> invasion and such.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>

Well yes, the Christians aren't saints by any stretch of the
imagination. I'd be happy if the rapture came tomorrow and took them all
up to their heaven, that way the rest of us could live in peace and
harmony.

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, T wrote:
> In article <pan.2008.04.03.00.21.55.481022@doubleclick.net> ,
> eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net says...
>> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:47:55 -0400, T wrote:

>>> But then that's how most religions work. Judaism didn't propagate well,
>>> but then came Christianity and now Islam which perfected the level of
>>> violence and hatred of the other.

>> Of course, because of your embedded denial, you refuse to see that all of
>> this "violence" is the response to the hundreds of years that the Xtians
>> have been terrorizing them with the crusades and the Bush/Bush/Cheney
>> invasion and such.

> Well yes, the Christians aren't saints by any stretch of the
> imagination. I'd be happy if the rapture came tomorrow and took them all
> up to their heaven, that way the rest of us could live in peace and
> harmony.

The first time I read what Rich wrote, I took him seriously, the second time
I thought he was being ironic, the thirs time I thought he might be being
serious after all.

BTW, the "rapture" is something invented by a certain sort of "Christian" in
recent decades, it is not an aspects of traditional or mainstream Christianity.

Matthew Huntbach

On 03/04/08 09:46, Danny wrote:
> Get off of this NG.

I'm not in that newsgroup. I'm in this newsgroup.

By the way, you can get rid of a lot of the spam you're complaining
about by getting a proper newsreader and avoiding Giggle Groups.

--
Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. http://www.pmoylan.org
For an e-mail address, see my web page.

Gunner wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:22:26 GMT, "Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie"
> <eatmyshorts@doubleclick.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Of course, because of your embedded denial, you refuse to see that
>> all of this "violence" is the response to the hundreds of years that
>> the Xtians have been terrorizing them with the crusades and the
>> Bush/Bush/Cheney invasion and such.

>
> Bush has only been in office 7 yrs, not hundreds

Yeah, but it feels like centuries.