What do you think about Microsoft's 2003 server?

I know it may seem a little odd to ask a question like this in a Linux
newsgroup, but I think the input here is very good. I have heard that
Microsoft's Server 2003 corrects a lot of the issues with stability and
security? Is this true? Do you think Microsoft is finally selling a stable
and secure OS? Or is Linux still the far superior server OS?

Aaron Lewis wrote:
> I know it may seem a little odd to ask a question like this in a Linux
> newsgroup, but I think the input here is very good. I have heard that
> Microsoft's Server 2003 corrects a lot of the issues with stability and
> security? Is this true? Do you think Microsoft is finally selling a stable
> and secure OS?

I don't know and I don't care.

> Or is Linux still the far superior server OS?

It doesn't matter to me whether MSWindows is "superior" to Linux or Linux is
"superior" to MSWindows. I use Linux for what it can do for me, not for it's
position within a hypothetical competition between it and MSWindows.

--
Lew Pitcher

Master Codewright and JOAT-in-training
Registered Linux User #112576 (http://counter.li.org/)
Slackware - Because I know what I'm doing.