My Inheritance: Solaris 9, ipfilter 3.4.29 x 3 systems, crashes

This is a discussion on My Inheritance: Solaris 9, ipfilter 3.4.29 x 3 systems, crashes within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Rugen, Len wrote: > I inherited a group of Solaris systems. They have been having ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > System Security and Security Related > IPFilter

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008
Joseph Tam
 
Posts: n/a
Default My Inheritance: Solaris 9, ipfilter 3.4.29 x 3 systems, crashes

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Rugen, Len wrote:

> I inherited a group of Solaris systems. They have been having some
> problems since before I was assimilated that I think I've tracked down
> to ipfilter.


I'm new to this list, and this is like the second submission I got in
like several weeks. Is the volume of this list is really that low or
are responses encouraged to reply straight to the original poster?

> The problem first described was the Veritas Vxsvc process would become
> unresponsive and unkillable until reboot. I finally discovered that
> this didn't happen until ipf rules were changed. The prior technique
> was ipfboot stop and ipfboot start. I changed this to ipfboot reload
> and it is much better. Before it died every time, if not immediately,
> after a few days, now it has just failed once after many changes.


This is not surprising as a stop/start will probably dump your state
table leaving existing connections orphaned.

> It looks like ipf was downloaded and installed as a precompiled package.
> Any suggestions / opinions on upgrading ipfilter on these systems? I'm
> currently reviewing the rules and to me, they are UGLY. Could cleaner
> rules help? They have very few KEEP STATE, maybe 500 entries and no
> grouping. From ipfstat, particularly for the pass out rules, few if any
> have count other than 0.


I would think that no set of rules, no matter how ugly, should ever crash
the firewall/kernel and cause what seems to be a data alignment error
(i.e. accessing word values on non-word boundaries). This looks like
a bug in IPF, and more knowledgable people could probably guess which bug.

I would hazard a guess that an upgrade to the latest IPF might be in order.

But straightening out your rules is a good thing to do, regardless of whether
it fixes your bug.

Joseph Tam <tam@math.ubc.ca>
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0