This is a discussion on Re: ipfilter causing kernel panic in FreeBSD 6.1 within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Darren Reed wrote: > Steve Clark wrote: > >>... >>Hi Darren, >> >>Since I ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Darren Reed wrote:
> Steve Clark wrote: > >>... >>Hi Darren, >> >>Since I knew it was night time "down under" I went ahead and just >>changed to code >>to print a message and return -1 in nat_finalise() then the tcp >>pointer was null. >>The system has stayed up now almost 24 hours - where yesterday it had >>20 panics. >> >>Is there some reason we wouldn't want to just dump/ignore this packet, >>since it seems to >>me that the initial syn and at least the first packet of the >>fragmented series had gotten lost >>and eventually will be retried. > > > Well, the original packet that caused this problem was not > part of a SYN - it was a midstream TCP packet. I suspect > something else is going on there. It may be part of a retransmitted > packet sent after the original NAT session is torn down. > I don't know. But obviously your policy allows the packet > to be sent (and received) so the NAT code should make > this possible. > > It might be more appropriate to not allow fragments that are > not the first fragment (offset = 0) to form NAT sessions for > the TCP/UDP protocols. That I could understand. > Yes that is what I was getting at. It is my understanding that in freebsd ip_nat happens before ip_filter - so we really can't filter these before they hit ip_nat. Since they are externally generated we would have to put another fw in front of this firewall to keep them out. Steve > Darren > > |