This is a discussion on outgoing SYN blocked even if it is allowed by ipf.rules within the IPFilter forums, part of the System Security and Security Related category; Hello, I've a problem with some incoming call of a VideoConferencing system which should pass my IPF firewall (v4....
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hello, I've a problem with some incoming call of a VideoConferencing system which should pass my IPF firewall (v4.1.8); I've watched it on both interfaces with tcpdump: 13:30:07.989088 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232 > 10.0.1.40.1720: S 356680283:356680283(0) win 8192 <mss 1460> 13:30:07.994005 IP 10.0.1.40.1720 > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232: S 85446234:85446234(0) ack 356680284 win 23360 <mss 536> 13:30:08.153383 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232 > 10.0.1.40.1720: . ack 1 win 8192 13:30:08.153391 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232 > 10.0.1.40.1720: P 1:5(4) ack 1 win 8192 13:30:08.154131 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232 > 10.0.1.40.1720: P 5:222(217) ack 1 win 8192 13:30:08.182341 IP 10.0.1.40.1720 > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232: P 1:104(103) ack 222 win 23139 13:30:08.320937 IP 10.0.1.40.1720 > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232: P 104:242(138) ack 222 win 23139 13:30:08.346463 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232 > 10.0.1.40.1720: . ack 104 win 8093 13:30:08.494931 IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3232 > 10.0.1.40.1720: . ack 242 win 8058 Now my VC tries (for some reason which I don't understand as well) to initiate a new TCP session here: 13:30:08.499026 IP 10.0.1.40.2546 > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3233: S 49301289:49301289(0) ack 979701897 win 23360 <mss 536> 13:30:08.499077 IP 10.0.1.136 > 10.0.1.40: ICMP host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx unreachable, length 36 which gets blocked by the IPF (2nd line): Jul 25 13:30:08 cazador ipmon[362]: 13:30:07.989080 em1 @0:74 p xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,3232 -> 10.0.1.40,1720 PR tcp len 20 44 -S K-S IN NAT Jul 25 13:30:09 cazador ipmon[362]: 13:30:08.499067 em1 @0:111 b 10.0.1.40,2546 -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,3233 PR tcp len 20 44 -AS OUT the line in ipf.rules is: pass out log first quick on em1 proto tcp from any to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx flags S keep state Why the traffic 'TCP 10.0.1.40.2546 > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.3233: SYN' does not match the rule? Thx in advance matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e <m.apitz@oclcpica.org> - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ OCLC PICA GmbH, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christine Magin-Weeger, Norbert Weinberger Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhaching, HRB Muenchen: 113261 |